Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [hyperion] 38872: Warning killing commit modified include/psdk/basetsd.h modified include/psdk/windef.h modified include/psdk/winnt.h Introduce new define __ROS_LONG64__ ("assume 64-bit long"), to use int instead of long in typedefs of 32-bit integers __ROS_LONG64__ automatically defined if __WINESRC__ is defined. No, __WINESRC__ alone is not enough modified base/applications/winhlp32/winhlp32.rbuild modified base/applications/wordpad/wordpad.rbuild Compile with __ROS_LONG64__ defi

[Timo Kreuzer]

[e-mail] schrieb:
> Author: hyperion
> Date: Sun Jan 18 00:25:43 2009
> New Revision: 38872

...
> Introduce new define __ROS_LONG64__ ("assume 64-bit long"), to use int instead of long in typedefs of 32-bit integers
>    __ROS_LONG64__ automatically defined if __WINESRC__ is defined. No, __WINESRC__ alone is not enough

If it's defined automatically, why isn't __WINESRC__ alone enough? And
when it's not enough anyway, why define __ROS_LONG64__  automatically at
all?
...
> #else /*  !_WIN64 */
> +#if !defined(__ROS_LONG64__)
>  typedef int INT_PTR, *PINT_PTR;
>  typedef unsigned int UINT_PTR, *PUINT_PTR;
> +#else
> +typedef long INT_PTR, *PINT_PTR;
> +typedef unsigned long UINT_PTR, *PUINT_PTR;
> +#endif

If we assume a 64bit long, why define INT_PTR to long on 32 bit target?