4 May
2006
4 May
'06
7:09 a.m.
On 5/3/06, Jonathan Wilson <jonwil(a)tpgi.com.au> wrote:
Can someone explain to me why someone doesnt just go
and bgab the MingW/GCC
source code and write a proper SEH implementation that is source-level and
binary-level compatible with the MS implementation (i.e. it uses the same
source syntax as the MS implementation and the same OS functionality and
mechanisim as the MS implementation)
Casper started doing this, in fact the gcc google summer of code page
suggests adding SEH support so it might be possible to get them to
merge it up stream now. Its possible the view on the patent has
changed after Borlands statement regarding SEH and Winelib.
--
Steven Edwards
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and
that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo