5 Oct
2004
5 Oct
'04
9:51 p.m.
Hi Eric,
--- Eric Kohl <eric.kohl(a)t-online.de> wrote:
Ok I will look at the busybox dhcpd for Windows.
Btw, I also think we should keep the dhcp server in a
differen
directory
because we will also need a dhcp client service. Therfore we should
use the
name dhcpssvc for the server service and dhcpcsvc for the client
service.
There is a client on sourceforge I have been looking at. It seems to be
more advanced than the normal windows DHCP client.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/rfc3442svc/
I agree the two services should be seperate.
Thanks
Steven
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com