25 Aug
2011
25 Aug
'11
1:38 p.m.
Aleksey Bragin wrote:
As for public/private, I suppose majority wanted to
have it private?
I don't have a strong position here because first of all we are
not going to discuss something, which is not for public ear,
Why do you say that?
What if I think Timo is actually an American spy out to destroy reactos due
to its Russian roots, and is planting code into the source which violates
Apples patent on the wheel and the colour blue? This is a topic I'd like to
discuss in private, as it's possible I may be wrong and Timo is really
working for the British.
In all seriousness, there are an infinite number of topics which may be
better suited to a private conversation.
I actually have two in mind, one being the driver signing issue.
Not all public facing companies should conduct all of their affairs in the
public eye.
and second is that meeting minutes are published
anyway in
our mailing list.
Of course the minutes can and should be published, but they can omit
sensitive information which a public chat cannot.
Private meetings allow people to discuss things more freely without fear of
the Americans hunting you down and declaring war.
Ged.