Re: [ros-dev] Subversion Migration Plan

Alex Ionescu wrote:

>   And here's the new tree structure that we (the
> devs on IRC) have 
>  mutually agreed to, with much compromise on every camp. We would 
>  appreciate the input of people who don't hang around, but are still very 
>  active and part of the Project (ie Hartmut, Eric, etc).
>
>  http://mok.lvcm.com/cgi-bin/reactos/roswiki?New_Tree_Structure 
Don't you think it's a little too late to ask for comments if you 
already made a decision on IRC? This should have been discussed on the 
mailing-list _only_!


>   Please try to be considerate, it wasn't easy
> getting so many people to 
>  agree, and many of us still have reservations. 
I can accept this structure but I don't really like it. IMO, the 
structure is too deep, for example the lib/win32 directory doesn't make 
sense to me. And I would like to move the static libraries to the lib 
directory and keep all DLLs (including .kbd and .cpl files) in a new dll 
directory. This way, our build system wouldn't need to process the lib 
directory three times (1st run: Build static libraries. 2nd run: Build 
import libraries. 3rd run: Build DLLs.)


Regards,
Eric