Re: [ros-dev] Janitorial Task - Get rid of TAG_NONE

[Emanuele Aliberti]

Steven Edwards wrote:

>  Hi,
> Royce suggested that we need to get rid of TAG_NONE and I remeber EA posting a list of
> tags a
> while back so maybe its a good time to look at the issue again. 
>
>   
>  
http://reactos.com:8080/pipermail/ros-dev/2004-October/000378.html

The complete and most updated list of pool tags is in the file
"pooltag.txt", which is distributed with the PoolMon tool.

>  We have quite a few cases where ExAllocatePool() and
> ExAllocatePoolWithQuota() is calling
> ExAllocatePagedPoolWithTag ( TAG_NONE ). I propose that we change the headers for these
> two
> functions to throw a compile error if we try to use them internally. We would still keep
> it
> implemented to support third party drivers but this way it will force developers to not
> use them.
>
>   
>  
I agree. Using untagged memory in kernel mode should be as fatal as
calling an unimplemented api.

Emanuele