On Dec 19, 2011, at 6:33 AM, Pierre Schweitzer <pierre(a)reactos.org> wrote:
Le lundi 19 décembre 2011 à 22:08 +1100, Adam a écrit
:
So long as this isn't a blocker (ie. one can
just use 128MB instead of
64MB to resolve this) then you may as well release it.
And when it doesn't work with 256MB, we try 512MB?
Your workaround appears not to work
I'm not sure where people keep getting that idea. It isn't and never was a RAM
size issue and balancer has nothing to do with it.
Regards,
Cameron