>On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:08 PM, João Jerónimo wrote:

>>Betov wrote:

>>* If ReactOS is a virtually dead Project, because of the topic that all of

>> You seem to carefully avoid and try to hide under the carpet, we (the

>> RosAsm Project), will effectively have serious problems, and not only

>> With its Name. See what I mean Alexey? ("Nothing has been found yet",

>> "these are rumors", and so on...).

>I can be wrong, but I think the solution followed by React's developers concerning that topic was

The only one (out of the proposed ones) that can avoid ReactOS' death...

>Really, there seems to be a lot less enthusiasm in this ML since all that discussion took place, but

This isn't an indicative that "ReactOS is a virtually dead Project"...

I also would like to see V.1.0 up and living some other day, David.

If not, I will have wasted ten years of my life for nope.

This is exactly the reason why I am questioning about the Audit conduct.

Up to now, I never got any answer (not considering the standard propaganda)

My questions are flat and simple:

* Do the developers of a GPL Project have anything to hide?

* Why are NOT the offending Files listed in the public "Locked List".

* If the Files are hidden under the carpet, who will fix them and how?

* Can you imagine that, if I can point them out, MicroSoft will miss them, the day

ReactOS will become a problem for their income?

* What is the mean for these outrageous bullshits saying that nothing has been found?

Betov.