Gabriel ilardi wrote:
> Ged +1
> Mike +1
>
> Absolutely agreed.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From:
gedmurphy@gmail.com
> To:
ros-dev@reactos.org
> Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 12:38:57 +0100
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] I want to develop the kernel of ReactOS, how do
> i join????
>
> I agree with Mike’s stance on this.
>
> Access to any MS source means no access to reactos.
>
> I think this point needs to be discussed and cemented as no one really
> seems to know what the official stance on this topic is anymore.
>
> Ged.
>
> *From:*
ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org
> [mailto:
ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Martin
> *Sent:* 16 May 2009 23:10
> *To:*
ros-dev@reactos.org
> *Subject:* Re: [ros-dev] I want to develop the kernel of ReactOS, how
> do i join????
>
> This is treading on thin ice.
> In my opinion, anyone having admitted to having accessed MS source
> code should not be allowed to write code for ReactOS and should never
> get commit access.
> Working on something not related to the source someone has seen,
> should still be a no go.
> As this will still increase the perception out there that ROS is tainted.
> And from my experienced of life in general, perception = reality,
> whether its true or not.
>
> Mike
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 12:09:00 -0500
> From:
drakekaizer666@gmail.com
> To:
ros-dev@reactos.org
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] I want to develop the kernel of ReactOS, how do
> i join????
>
> He'd need to demonstrate that whatever he developed, the reason for
> what his code does can be tracked to available documentation, not the
> leaked source code.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hotmail® has a new way to see what's up with your friends. Check it
> out.