Re: [ros-dev] KeBugCheck

[Gunnar Dalsnes]

Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
>   Mike Nordell wrote:
>  
> > Hartmut Birr wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> > If not, it's simply impossible to get correct and intended functionality,
> > should preemtion occur. 
Irql must obviously stay the same no matter if we were preempted and/or 
taskswitched a trillion times. The case here is probably a bug in the 
task switcher, where it "restores" the thread at a irql different from 
what was current when it was "suspended", and after 11 hours(!) this bug 
just happends to materialize in-between two related KeGetKurrentIrql 
calls. It doesnt sound very likely, does it... Still, i cant think of 
anything else that may cause this behaviour.

> >    
> >  
>  I very much doubt the irql should change at all... 
Youre right

>   
>  Best Regards,
>  Thomas
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
>  http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  
>  
>