2 Dec
2009
2 Dec
'09
3:51 p.m.
2005 is very commonly used. 2008 is quite poorly supported.
I can definitely understand removing support for 2003 and older as those are very much deprecated. My company uses 2005 and I know that many others do as well.
Maya
Zachary Gorden wrote:
Any reason to still keep 2005?
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy@gmail.com mailto:gedmurphy@gmail.com> wrote:
I’ve gone down the path of virtually rewriting the msvc backend for rbuild. Our current implementation had completely outgrown its original design and was becoming very difficult to manage, as highlighted when I was adding support for VS 2010. Anyway, whilst I’m doing this I think it’s a good time assess what we want to support. We currently support Visual Studio 6, Visual Studio .NET 2002 and Visual Studio.NET 2003. This is a waste of time IMO and only adds to the complexity of the module I’m proposing to remove support for these 3 products unless anyone has any reasons against. Ged. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org <mailto:Ros-dev@reactos.org> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev