Re: [ros-dev] rbuild msvc backend

[Maya Posch]

2005 is very commonly used. 2008 is quite poorly supported.

I can definitely understand removing support for 2003 and older as those 
are very much deprecated. My company uses 2005 and I know that many 
others do as well.


Maya

Zachary Gorden wrote:
>   Any reason to still keep 2005?
>  
>  On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com 
>  <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>  
>      I’ve gone down the path of virtually rewriting the msvc backend for
>      rbuild. Our current implementation had completely outgrown its
>      original design and was becoming very difficult to manage, as
>      highlighted when I was adding support for VS 2010.
>  
>       
>  
>      Anyway, whilst I’m doing this I think it’s a good time assess what
>      we want to support. We currently support Visual Studio 6, Visual
>      Studio .NET 2002 and Visual Studio.NET 2003. This is a waste of time
>      IMO and only adds to the complexity of the module
>  
>      I’m proposing to remove support for these 3 products unless anyone
>      has any reasons against.
>  
>       
>  
>      Ged.
>  
>       
>  
>  
>      _______________________________________________
>      Ros-dev mailing list
>      Ros-dev(a)reactos.org <mailto:[e-mail]>
>      http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  
>  
>  
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev