18 Nov
2005
18 Nov
'05
7:33 p.m.
Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
I guess our wine/windef.h is the reason why we need
ntstatus.h and
winternl.h, but I haven't checked yet. Honestly, these headers are kind
of a mess... Just including public headers and one private header file
for undocumented stuff would be much clearer, especially if precompiled
headers were used, that'd simplify things a lot, I guess.
I have no problem with including ntstatus.h, even though it is not
strictly necessary as it is just defines. However, I don't like the idea
of including winternl.h as crypt32 (specifically high level things like
certificate handling) shouldn't need to depend on low-level and
undocumented structures, defines and function declarations. Can you tell
me what errors you get without including winternl.h?
--
Rob Shearman