3 Jul
2007
3 Jul
'07
7:25 p.m.
On 7/3/07, Thomas Weidenmueller <w3seek(a)reactos.com> wrote:
I believe we've been very clear on the "or
later version" clause. That's
what the license says, and that's the rights we grant everybody.
That's partly why I ask.
Especially ReactOS should remain open to
patent-related issues, at least
allowing derived work to deal with patent issues.
Of course GPL3 code cannot go back into trunk unless it remains an
independent part, ie. a stand-alone application, etc. That's the only
downside I see. I think we only have to really think about switching to
GPL3 in case WINE switches to it.
And this is the other part. There was a situation come up with Wine
recently where the LGPLv3 would have served better than the LGPLv2 due
to the termination clause in the v2 not giving a grace period for
non-compliance. At some point Wine will get LGPLv3 I expect of for no
other reason, then to clear up the problem of immediate license
termination due to an inadvertent violation.
--
Steven Edwards
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and
that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo