Pushing the question (which was the real question in Ionescu's mail...).
What was the reason for the change?
It would be preferable to keep everything in intel syntax. Especially as
this is an NT OS.
It should also be noted that this is in a branch, not trunk.
Ged.
-----Original Message-----
From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On
Behalf Of Aleksey Bragin
Sent: 02 September 2010 21:55
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [akhaldi] 48687: [FREELDR] - Convert
fat12/16 boot sector helper code to gas syntax. Brought to you by the Arty.
[CMAKE] - Add freeldr and setupldr to build.
I'm anti-AT&T syntax guy too :)
WBR,
Aleksey.
P.S. Nice to see Alex's post here, in his good old style.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Daniel Reimer" <daniel.reimer(a)reactos.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 11:33 PM
To: "ReactOS Development List" <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [akhaldi] 48687: [FREELDR] - Convert
fat12/16 boot sector helper code to gas syntax. Brought to you by the Arty.
[CMAKE] - Add freeldr and setupldr to build.
Err, nice to call ppl idiots who try to get the
project further...
If there are bugs, feel free to fix them...
Am 02.09.2010 21:17, schrieb Alex Ionescu:
> This is retarded, GAS supports Intel syntax. Why did this require
> rewriting everything in AT&T syntax and introducing bugs? And what's
> up with calling AT&T syntax "GAS" Syntax.
>
> I wonder what Brian would say....
>
> It's funny how this project gets rid of old developers, gets new
> developers, and has them make the same mistakes/idiotic things the old
> developers left for in the first place...
>
> Good job!
>
> Best regards,
> Alex Ionescu
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev