"NT-Compatible".
I can make a bootable Windows XP Professional Live CD, with all the
functionality you just described, bar X11.
It all boils down into how much effort you take to make it.
On 12/4/05, Jonathan Andrews <jon(a)jonshouse.co.uk> wrote:
  Hello to the group.... my first post....
 I noticed some talk about the Reactos installer following the windows
 form. As a long time NT admin who moved into product development on
 Linux I would just like to point out how mediocre the windows installer
 is.
 With a bootable linux ISO you get a full network stack, functional USB
 support, detected UDMA IDE drivers, Vesfa FB X11 etc etc etc... with the
 windows installer you get a kernel, a few utils and a pretty inflexable
 installer.
 Would it not make more sense to write an installer thats based on a
 bootable Linux image - if nothing else the use of networking offers a
 host of possibilities (diskless installs, updates from the internet
 during the install phase and so on).
 Is the aim to clone windows, or to produce an operating system that is
 API compatible with win32 ? They are very different aims with very
 different requirements!
 Jon
 _______________________________________________
 Ros-dev mailing list
 Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
 
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
 
--
"I had a handle on life, but then it broke"