On whose authority did he revert his driver? Just
kidding ;-)
But seriously, it's ok if he wants to stop maintaing it (i8042prt is
something of a bad omen, 2 devs already went crazy, I hope not a
third...), but I'd still like it to be in trunk.
Maybe someone will finally listen to me (for the 3rd time...) and use
the damn DDK driver as a sample (like the license allows you) and
document it extensively and/or even directly try to identify
bugs/missing features by looking at the code. There is NO LAW AGAINST THIS.
I would be more than happy to help with this effort, as I have stated
before. I wanted Hervé's work to stay in also..
I imagine he copied it from branch to trunk since 0.3.1 was branched
before he committed the new i8042prt code, so it was a known good
copy.
WD
--
22:38 <@WaxDragon> false ^ true
22:39 < false> :(
22:39 < false> dont you think you can XOR me and get away with it! I
always return!