Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [sserapion] 44807: Add definitions for the x86bios emulator. http://www.geoffchappell.com/viewer.htm?doc=studies/windows/km/hal/api/x86bios/index.htm

[Timo Kreuzer]

LOL, I love that "I couldn't find any documentation on MSDN and in some
arbitrary collection of headers, so it must not exist".

I also never talked about MS provided documentation. 3rd party
documentation still qualifies as documentation and it's better than
nothing, if not even better than a lot of MS documentation.

Here, for you to read:
http://www.geoffchappell.com/viewer.htm?doc=studies/windows/km/hal/api/x86b…

Maybe it helps you to understand that x86Bios functions have absolutely
nothing to do with EFI.

Done.
Timo

Alex Ionescu wrote:
>  
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&q=%22x8…
>
>  Your search - "x86BiosCall" site:microsoft.com - did not match any documents.
>
>  bash-3.2$ grep -ir 'x86BiosCall' /ntdev/headers/ --include *.h --include *.c
>  bash-3.2$
>
>  Your turn.
>
>  On 2009-12-30, at 12:23 PM, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
>
>    
> >   Prove it.
> >
> >  Alex Ionescu wrote:
> >      
> > >   The services are undocumented and reserved for
> > > EFI.
> > >
> > >  They are not "Documented" and there's no reason to use the Vista
> > > implementation.
> > >
> > >
> > >         
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >       
>  Best regards,
>  Alex Ionescu
>
>
>    
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev