WaxDragon wrote:
I think a "status" page and a testing guide would be most helpful. The status page could be used to fend off the inevitable questions,
How exactly would that status page look like ? Who would maintain it ?
and the guide will highlight the things that *do* need testing, and if everyone is testing the same things, then regressions will become self-evident.
Dosn't everything need testing ?
Maarten Bosma