Re: [ros-dev] [ion] 20554: - Fix shamefully dangerously broken WorkThread/Queue/Item implementation:

[Ged Murphy]

Steven Edwards wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1/4/06, Ge van Geldorp [e-mail] wrote:
> > I was assuming that every developer is subscribed to ros-bugs, apparently an
> > incorrect assumption. On the other hand, perhaps ros-bugs is redundant and
> > Bugzilla reports should go to ros-dev instead?
>
> I think ros-bugs is kind of redundant. Its not like we get that many
> reports yet. I think we should freeze the list and just forward it to
> ros-dev until we start getting more than say 10 bug reports a day.

Ros-Bugs is one of our most active lists. It's very useful and I would 
really like to see this stay.
IMO, Ros-SVN is kinda redundant as the info it displays is available in 
Ros-Diffs