You basically assumed that a header from another file (probably copy- pasted) applies to the file you modified.
While I'm certainly being pedantic, and I admit it -- this shouldn't be a change to brush over.
Someone needs to figure out if the devs agree with v3 or not -- I personally don't so I've removed that from my kernel license.
You explicitly added "or later" to this file.
On 3-Oct-08, at 12:20 PM, Aleksey Bragin wrote:
Have a look at the headers other files in this directory has, including "main" csrss.c:
- This software is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
- published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
- License, or (at your option) any later version.
This is where I've got this idea to take "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version".
Or is this the "at your option" clause? But then why is it present in this old header? Whose option is this? The one who wrote? Or the one who reuses?
I don't get all the flood on the irc channels related to this. I didn't change license of this component, ffs. If I did - explain me how, and I will acknowledge and fix my mistake (if any). I did the same change for, smss, a few days earlier, also with reformatting (changing headers), so let's solve that fast.
WBR, Aleksey Bragin.
On Oct 3, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Alex Ionescu wrote:
Please show me where the developers of this code agreed to having their code GPL V3 licensed.
I would like to see a full trail of every developer that wrote this code, as well as written permission from them for you to slap on this license.
Thank you.
On 23-Sep-08, at 7:45 AM, fireball@svn.reactos.org wrote:
- LICENSE: GPL v2 or later - See COPYING in the top level
directory
Best regards, Alex Ionescu
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Best regards, Alex Ionescu