The logical layout is exactly what is wrong with the tree. The tree is currently laid out in a manner which you would expect someone who doesn't understand NT architecture. Things are laid out by type instead of by architecture.
Yes, there is no sense in doing two mainly unrelated very big tasks simulteneously. Also my own opinion still hasn't changed - existing layout is quite logical (there are exceptions, but they are everywhere), and any modularization could be achieved already with existing tools like sysgen.Let cmake branch be actual cmake experiment, not an awesome attempt to fix whole ReactOS at onceWBR,Aleksey Bragin.From: Zachary GordenSent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 9:45 PMSubject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [akhaldi] 48236: Create a branch forcmake bringup.I also support a reshuffling of the directories, but not in the cmake branch. Let that be used JUST for getting cmake up and running and if/once that is merged into trunk, then we look into changing the structure. Best not to complicate one task by adding more to it.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev