?

And who decides? This sounds like utter BS!

So while navigating it's okay to get 100000 "UIMPLEMENTED FOR PIDL" or 100 IRP unimplemented messages, but it's wrong to get other dprints?!

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu


On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey@reactos.org> wrote:
That’d be great but it’s important to not "overdo” the job.
 
WBR,
Aleksey.
 
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53635: - Downgrade someDPRINT1s to DPRINTs.
 
Then why not get rid of ALL similar dprints?

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu


On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey@reactos.org> wrote:
If someone wants to implement
1. Alternate resource support
2. BasePostImportInit and related advanced stuff
3. Application compatibility hacks support
he should be at least that smart to see that support for those features is totally non-existant, so there is nothing to warn about.
 
It’s similar to having this reminder in the early init stage: DPRINT1(“ReactOS is in alpha stage, some features may be missing. You have been warned!\n”);
 
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.
 
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53635: - Downgrade someDPRINT1s to DPRINTs.
 
For the stuff that was obviously designed to warn at least once, have you filled out bug reports for all these missing features, or do you think that someone will now remember all this missing code?

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu


On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:28 AM, <fireball@svn.reactos.org> wrote:
Author: fireball
Date: Thu Sep  8 08:28:41 2011
New Revision: 53635

URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=53635&view=rev
Log:
- Downgrade some DPRINT1s to DPRINTs.

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev