Re: [ros-dev] New Release - how're you feeling?

[mail.comcast.net]

Yeah, but how many changes are major features being implemented?  For 
instance, the header reorganization doesn't really add to compatibility, 
and in some cases may actually cause regressions, etc.

Richard

Ge van Geldorp wrote:

> >  From: Robert
> > Köpferl
> >
> > Asides from that a really small incease could reflect our 
> > shame. Which is however too small or just ridiculus.
> > --> An alternative (to express our shame) would be to just release and
> > not to anounce (I will not press the sf-button) the release.
> >     
> >  
> Just a datapoint: the 0.2.6 branch was created at r14154. We're now at
> r16251. That means that in the last 3 months we have created an incredible
> amount of changes, about 2100. That's 1/7th of all the changes between 1997
> and 2005! Now, not every change is user-visible and some of the changes are
> even regressions, but still, I'm not ashamed to bring out a new release when
> this much work has been done.
>
>   
>
> >  Conclusion:
> > So a branch will occour within let's say the next 2 weeks to have ROS 
> > 0.2.7 (our suggested next ver) fixed and built within another 2 weeks.
> >
> > This is what I would do. What do you think about?
> >     
> >  
> I agree completely.
>
> Gé van Geldorp.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
> http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>   
>