Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 36426: [FORMATTING] - Reformat to the kernel coding style.

[Aleksey Bragin]

Where is the GPL v3 claim? CSRSS was claimed to be "GPL v2 or any
later version (at your option)". I didn't mark it as v3, it WAS so
already then.
On Oct 3, 2008, at 7:25 PM, gedmurphy wrote:
>   Furthermore, you can't mix and match GPL2 and GPL3
> in the same module.
>  "When we say that GPLv2 and GPLv3 are incompatible, it means there
>  is no
>  legal way to combine code under GPLv2 with code under GPLv3 in a
>  single
>  program. This is because both GPLv2 and GPLv3 are copyleft
>  licenses: each of
>  them says, "If you include code under this license in a larger
>  program, the
>  larger program must be under this license too." There is no way to
>  make them
>  compatible. We could add a GPLv2-compatibility clause to GPLv3, but it
>  wouldn't do the job, because GPLv2 would need a similar clause."