Re: [ros-dev] revision 26772, Mon May 14 03:18:42 2007 UTC

[jimtabor]

Hi!

>   It should probably be
>  + Exp -= (1 - EXCESS);
>  in EFtoF() and
>  + Exp += (1 - EXCESS);
>  in FtoEF(). The other way round.
>
>     
No, this would break compatibility. The way to verify this. Write a 
driver, install it
and send a packet to it, so to activate the test. Have the driver dump 
to WinDbg.
>   Suggestion to make it a little clearer:
>  #define BIAS 127
>  Exp -+= (BIAS - 2); 
I know about the IEEE bias. I'm just using my old 68k code that I'm 
comfortable with. I'll
change this later with the Dc handle stuff I'm still testing.


Thanks,
James