My only concern is Visual Studio
Whatever you do, you must make sure all projects are able to be fully
loaded by Visual Studio 2005/2008 without the interaction of rbuild.
As one of the hopes is to make everything in ROS VS compatible and
buildable by Visual Studio, I would consider anything moving away from
this a regression.
Ged.
Marc Piulachs wrote:
From all changes introduced on my rbuild branch auto generated
resources seems to be the most controversial by far so I will try to
explain here the design decision behind it
One of my particular obsessions is trying to optimize and automate the
maxium ammout of things, if something can be reasonably created
automatically why do it by hand?
CURRENT SITUATION
=================
Currently the version common defines REACTOS_STR_FILE_DESCRIPTION ,
REACTOS_STR_INTERNAL_NAME and REACTOS_STR_ORIGINAL_FILENAME ,
localized resources and theme manifest are added to [modulename].rc ,
rsrc.rc or splitted between both.
Problems:
- Theme manifests files "manifest.xml" are architecture
dependent (X86)
- Duplicated content, we will have hundreds of identical
manifest files for every aplication
- No way to compile an aplication without manifest
- No way to compile an aplication with only specified
localizations
- Duplicated work, rbuild has all the information required
to automatically generate the defines
- If we decide to rename or introduce a new define in the
future we will have to edit all resources by hand.
- Resource localizations are compiled with any control ,
the only way to check if they are included is by hand.
Advantatges to my proposal:
- It solve all the above problems.
- Reduce man work
- Allows future changes in the format (editing the
resource generator source code (1 file) vs all resources files on SVN)
- It's the base to other future enchancments , when a new
feature is added to rbuild we have just to modify it and all modules
will automatically inherit it.
An most important of all , it represents a change of the model to a
metadata oriented build process. You describe the content (source
code , resources ...) rather than the build , rbuild uses that
information to generate the apropiate image (as always) but this
information can also be used for multiple other things, analitics ,
reports , web ....
How does it work?
=================
First of all IT'S OPTIONAL , you can decide to use it or not, your choice.
We will use the eventvwr.rbuild as sample:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<module name="eventvwr" type="win32gui"
installbase="system32"
installname="eventvwr.exe">
<include base="eventvwr">.</include>
<include base="eventvwr"
root="intermediate">.</include>
...
<!-- Auto generated stuff -->
<automanifest>manifest.xml</automanifest>
<autoresource>auto.rc</autoresource>
<!-- Authors -->
<developer>mpiulachs</developer>
<translator>cfinck</translator>
<translator>fireball</translator>
<translator>mpiulachs</translator>
<metadata description="ReactOS Event Log Viewer" />
<!-- Avialable localizations for this module -->
<localization
isoname="de-DE">lang/de-DE.rc</localization>
<localization
isoname="en-US">lang/en-US.rc</localization>
<localization
isoname="es-ES">lang/es-ES.rc</localization>
<localization
isoname="fr-FR">lang/fr-FR.rc</localization>
<localization
isoname="ru-RU">lang/ru-RU.rc</localization>
</module>
to turn auto resources on we have to add the <autoresource> element
with the name of the resource that will be created in the INTERMEDIATE
folder in this case it will be named "auto.rc".
It will also automatically create the apropiate manifest.xml file for
the architecture being build (x86 or PPC) and will reference it in
"auto.rc"
Also it will validate and include the localizations, even it has
localizations for 5 languages it will only compile those specified on
languages.rbuild
See attached files for autogenerated content
I tried to explain the motivation behind my changes and why I think
they are positive , of course I'm open to your questions , ideas or
comments but please be contructive and argument your point of view ,
"I don't like it , we won't use it" as someone said is not an expected
opinion.
/Marc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev