Proposal for deletion

[Pierre Schweitzer]

Hi,
today, after looking at the daily source analysis we have, I found out
that all that stuff could be improved by lightening trunk. We have huge
amount of unused code (even not linked in CMake) rotting in trunk.
I'm mainly talking about icu4ros. AFAIK it was an attempt from KJK for I
even don't recall what.
Here is my proposal: we do a branch for this. And then, we remove it
from trunk. This will make things lighter, without loosing code.
Any objections/comments?
Regards,
Pierre

+1 for shorter buildtime
On Sunday, October 02, 2011 9:59 PM, "Pierre Schweitzer"
<pierre(a)reactos.org> wrote:
>   Hi,
>  today, after looking at the daily source analysis we have, I found out
>  that all that stuff could be improved by lightening trunk. We have huge
>  amount of unused code (even not linked in CMake) rotting in trunk.
>  I'm mainly talking about icu4ros. AFAIK it was an attempt from KJK for I
>  even don't recall what.
>  Here is my proposal: we do a branch for this. And then, we remove it
>  from trunk. This will make things lighter, without loosing code.
>  Any objections/comments?
>  Regards,
>  Pierre
>   
--
With best regards
Caemyr

[Aleksey Bragin]

It's been too much time since the last icu4ros-related commit, so I
fully support creating a branch (is anyone going to work on it
really? But ok, let's create it then) and removing it from trunk.
WBR,
Aleksey.
On Oct 2, 2011, at 11:59 PM, Pierre Schweitzer wrote:
>   Hi,
>  today, after looking at the daily source analysis we have, I found out
>  that all that stuff could be improved by lightening trunk. We have
>  huge
>  amount of unused code (even not linked in CMake) rotting in trunk.
>  I'm mainly talking about icu4ros. AFAIK it was an attempt from KJK
>  for I
>  even don't recall what.
>  Here is my proposal: we do a branch for this. And then, we remove it
>  from trunk. This will make things lighter, without loosing code.
>  Any objections/comments?
>  Regards,
>  Pierre

[Pierre Schweitzer]

This has been done with r53996 & r54000.
Le lundi 03 octobre 2011 à 00:14 +0400, Aleksey Bragin a écrit :
>   It's been too much time since the last
> icu4ros-related commit, so I
>  fully support creating a branch (is anyone going to work on it
>  really? But ok, let's create it then) and removing it from trunk.
>  WBR,
>  Aleksey.
>  On Oct 2, 2011, at 11:59 PM, Pierre Schweitzer wrote:
> >   Hi,
> >  today, after looking at the daily source analysis we have, I found out
> >  that all that stuff could be improved by lightening trunk. We have
> >  huge
> >  amount of unused code (even not linked in CMake) rotting in trunk.
> >  I'm mainly talking about icu4ros. AFAIK it was an attempt from KJK
> >  for I
> >  even don't recall what.
> >  Here is my proposal: we do a branch for this. And then, we remove it
> >  from trunk. This will make things lighter, without loosing code.
> >  Any objections/comments?
> >  Regards,
> >  Pierre 
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev