Re: [ros-dev] 0.3.0 RC1 Update

[Murphy, Ged (Bolton)]

WaxDragon wrote:

>   The only bug
>  I'm concerned about right now is the broken links in the start menu,
>  which I think is even fixed in trunk.  Nothing else can really be
>  addressed at this point. 
That is easily fixed with a small hack in the explorer code.
It's certainly not a correct fix, but it will ensure the links work for this
release and allow us to move on.

If you agree, I'll change it tonight.

Ged.

[WaxDragon]

HAX would be fine.  What really need to be tested is the livecd.  Last
time I checked, networking didn't work at all under vmware or qemu.  I
can test that tonight, unless someone gets to it first.

On 7/11/06, Murphy, Ged (Bolton) <MurphyG(a)cmpbatteries.co.uk> wrote:
>   WaxDragon wrote:
>
> >   The only bug
> >  I'm concerned about right now is the broken links in the start menu,
> >  which I think is even fixed in trunk.  Nothing else can really be
> >  addressed at this point. 
>  That is easily fixed with a small hack in the explorer code.
>  It's certainly not a correct fix, but it will ensure the links work for this
>  release and allow us to move on.
>
>  If you agree, I'll change it tonight.
>
>  Ged.
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  

-- 
<GedMurphy> why does the size matter?

[WaxDragon]

On 7/11/06, WaxDragon <waxdragon(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>   HAX would be fine.  What really need to be tested is
> the livecd.  Last
>  time I checked, networking didn't work at all under vmware or qemu.
>  I can test that tonight, unless someone gets to it first. 
Livecd has no networking under VMWare or qemu.  ipconfig yields
ERROR_NO_DATA.  Do we reapply the vm hacks as we did to 0.2.9?

WD
-- 
<GedMurphy> why does the size matter?