Call for Vote

[Maarten Bosma]

Subject: Freeze every module in svn until it got audited
Proposed by: Maarten Bosma / Art Yerkes
Days of discussion: 7 (started 09.02.2006)
Days of voting: 7 (starting in 24 hours from now - 16.02.2006 20:00 GMT)
Proposal: Do not allow changes to a module until it got audited.
Options: [ ] Accept proposal [ ] Do not accept [ ] Further Discussion

Remarks: I took the first appearance of the idea as beginning of discussion.

[Ged Murphy]

Maarten Bosma wrote:
>   Subject: Freeze every module in svn until it got
> audited
>  Proposed by: Maarten Bosma / Art Yerkes
>  Days of discussion: 7 (started 09.02.2006)
>  Days of voting: 7 (starting in 24 hours from now - 16.02.2006 20:00 GMT)
>  Proposal: Do not allow changes to a module until it got audited.
>  Options: [ ] Accept proposal [ ] Do not accept [ ] Further Discussion
>
>  Remarks: I took the first appearance of the idea as beginning of 
>  discussion.
>  
Should this not wait until the vote it relies on is complete?
Also, it needs to be put in the forums..

[Maarten Bosma]

Ged Murphy wrote:
>   Should this not wait until the vote it relies on is
> complete?
>  Also, it needs to be put in the forums.. 
I meant to start the vote tomorrow, but announce it today, so people can 
articulate their objections. Like this:

James Tabor wrote:
>   We can not do this yet. It also runs against the
> current vote!
>  
>  From plan B:
>  
>  - continue development in old repository: all new commits must not be derivative of
> copyright work (I'm repeating here, but that's important) - thus no dirty reverse
> engineering  
Yes it is a vote to change it. It will start after the other vote is 
finished.


Maarten Bosma

[James Tabor]

Maarten Bosma wrote:
>   Subject: Freeze every module in svn until it got
> audited
>  Proposed by: Maarten Bosma / Art Yerkes
>  Days of discussion: 7 (started 09.02.2006)
>  Days of voting: 7 (starting in 24 hours from now - 16.02.2006 20:00 GMT)
>  Proposal: Do not allow changes to a module until it got audited.
>  Options: [ ] Accept proposal [ ] Do not accept [ ] Further Discussion
>  
>  Remarks: I took the first appearance of the idea as beginning of 
>  discussion. 
Hi,
We can not do this yet. It also runs against the current vote!

 From plan B:

- continue development in old repository: all new commits must not be derivative of
copyright work 
(I'm repeating here, but that's important) - thus no dirty reverse engineering

Thanks,
James

[Aleksey Bragin]

Since it is a nonsense (in a way it is written), we are waiting for  
Ged Murphy's full proposal on this issue tomorrow.

Please ignore this email for now.


WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.

On Feb 15, 2006, at 10:58 PM, Maarten Bosma wrote:

>   Subject: Freeze every module in svn until it got
> audited
>  Proposed by: Maarten Bosma / Art Yerkes
>  Days of discussion: 7 (started 09.02.2006)
>  Days of voting: 7 (starting in 24 hours from now - 16.02.2006 20:00  
>  GMT)
>  Proposal: Do not allow changes to a module until it got audited.
>  Options: [ ] Accept proposal [ ] Do not accept [ ] Further Discussion
>
>  Remarks: I took the first appearance of the idea as beginning of  
>  discussion.

[Rick Langschultz]

Subject: Freeze every module in svn until it got audited
Proposed by: Maarten Bosma / Art Yerkes
Days of discussion: 7 (started 09.02.2006)
Days of voting: 7 (starting in 24 hours from now - 16.02.2006 20:00 GMT)
Proposal: Do not allow changes to a module until it got audited.
Options: [ ] Accept proposal [ ] Do not accept [ X] Further Discussion

Remarks: I took the first appearance of the idea as beginning of  
discussion.

Notes: I think each module in SVN should be audited and then be  
unlocked so developers can checkout parts of the operating system.