Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [hbelusca] 68975: [VSSAPI] Compile the THISCALL calling convention support only for x86. On x64, we are automatically in THISCALL. Also I suggest we turn this file (and maybe also /lib/sdk/crt/exce...

[Thomas Faber]

On 2015-09-04 03:14, [e-mail] wrote:
> Also I suggest we turn this file (and maybe also /lib/sdk/crt/except/i386/cpp.s) into a "msvc-thiscall.c" as it is already done in some other DLLs (like in ole32, riched20).

ole32 and riched20 don't export mangled names.
MSVC ignores redirects for them in the def file so it needs to be
assembly (or C++ code).

[Hermès BÉLUSCA - MAÏTO]

OK I didn't know that! I proposed this stuff because I noticed that the
msvc-thiscall.c files otherwise had the same (inlined-asm) macro than the
.s.

Hermès.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Ros-dev [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de Thomas Faber
Envoyé : vendredi 4 septembre 2015 07:12
À : [e-mail]
Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [hbelusca] 68975: [VSSAPI] Compile the
THISCALL calling convention support only for x86. On x64, we are
automatically in THISCALL. Also I suggest we turn this file (and maybe also
/lib/sdk/crt/exce...

On 2015-09-04 03:14, [e-mail] wrote:
> Also I suggest we turn this file (and maybe also

/lib/sdk/crt/except/i386/cpp.s) into a "msvc-thiscall.c" as it is already
done in some other DLLs (like in ole32, riched20).

ole32 and riched20 don't export mangled names.
MSVC ignores redirects for them in the def file so it needs to be assembly
(or C++ code).

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[e-mail]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev