Re: [ros-dev] [VOTE] Miscelanea branches

[Sylvain Petreolle]

--- Casper Hornstrup [e-mail] wrote:
> I'd like to close this discussion with a vote.
>
> Should we allow branches (other than trunk) with mixed new development and bugfixes
> unrelated to the new development that is on the branch (miscelanea branches) ?
>
> [X] Yes, do allow miscelanea branches
>
> [ ] No, don't allow miscelanea branches
>
> Casper

Have an svn branch gives a nice way to revert/update
and permits others to work with a different POV on the project.

Even if only some are using it, it can help ros a lot.
(look at the xmlbuildsystem branch that speeds up the compilation a lot)

Kind regards,

Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle)

humans are like computers,
yesterday the BIOS was all
- today its just a word

[Casper Hornstrup]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] 
> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Sylvain Petreolle
> Sent: 13. marts 2005 20:14
> To: ReactOS Development List
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [VOTE] Miscelanea branches
>
> --- Casper Hornstrup [e-mail] wrote:
> > I'd like to close this discussion with a vote.
> >
> > Should we allow branches (other than trunk) with mixed new
>
> development
> > and bugfixes unrelated to the new development that is on
>
> the branch (miscelanea branches) ?
> > [X] Yes, do allow miscelanea branches
> >
> > [ ] No, don't allow miscelanea branches
> >
> > Casper
>
> Have an svn branch gives a nice way to revert/update and 
> permits others to work with a different POV on the project.
>
> Even if only some are using it, it can help ros a lot.
> (look at the xmlbuildsystem branch that speeds up the 
> compilation a lot)

Let me make it clear that the vote is about wether or not to allow
a particular type of branch which have some bad consequences. Not
branches in general. See
http://reactos.com:8080/archives/public/ros-dev/2005-March/002083.html
for a description of the common branch types.

Do you have commit access?

Casper