The only things I have habitually used in rosapps are ctm, ncftp, and download. I'd hate to see these go away. OTOH, there are quite a few things that l would consider "tests" in rosapps that could be moved. I think the argument that rosapps to long to build is crap. If you want to reduce the build time, ditch explorer.
On Mar 12, 2009 11:02 AM, "Ged" gedmurphy@gmail.com wrote:
I prefer this idea.
I'd like to see rosapps removed completely and have all non essential stuff in trunk built via an rbuild variable (turned off by default)
Ged.
-----Original Message----- From: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org [mailto: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] ...
Behalf Of Thomas Bluemel Sent: 12 March 2009 14:17 To: ReactOS Development List Subject: Re: [ros-de...
The thing is to establish rules of what goes where, and if something doesn't fit - move it, or delete it. Such a mess can't last infinitely.
I'm against removing rosapps completely, as Steven pointed out, there must be a place, a playground, for additional services, applications, drivers.
On Mar 12, 2009, at 6:22 PM, WaxDragon wrote:
The only things I have habitually used in rosapps are ctm, ncftp, and download. I'd hate to see these go away. OTOH, there are quite a few things that l would consider "tests" in rosapps that could be moved. I think the argument that rosapps to long to build is crap. If you want to reduce the build time, ditch explorer.
On Mar 12, 2009 11:02 AM, "Ged" gedmurphy@gmail.com wrote:
I prefer this idea.
I'd like to see rosapps removed completely and have all non essential stuff in trunk built via an rbuild variable (turned off by default)
Ged. -----Original Message----- From: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] ...
Behalf Of Thomas Bluemel Sent: 12 March 2009 14:17 To: ReactOS Development List Subject: Re: [ros-de...
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev