New ReactOS Homepage - Status

[Klemens Friedl]

New ReactOS Homepage - Status

Mail-Content:

* Status
* Questions



Homepage status:

The homepage beta test started last week. Join #reactos-hp for more
information. We will start reviewing and translating the content in a few
days.
Content List: http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/New_Homepage_Content

When this is done (approximatly one week) we will be able to relaunch the
homepage!

Homepage release date: "When it's done!" ;)



Questions:

1) Should the homepage section be called ... ?
a: developer
b: development
c: developing

2) Should the static homepage pages be ... ?
a: valid HTML 4.01
b: valid XHTML 1.0
c: both variants (two versions)
d: something else (e.g. xhtml 1.1)

3) What's your opinion about the following homepage content structure ... ?
* Home
* Community 
* Support
* Developer / Developing / Development
* myReactOS
(more details: http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/New_Homepage_Content )
a: okay, good structure
b: ... -> then edit/add comments to the wiki page see link above !!!


Klemens Friedl

-- 
5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse f�r Mail, Message, More +++

[Reuben Perelman]

I don't really care as long as it has a working forum.

Also, it should be HTML 4. What the hell is XHTML about? You end the 
tags with a slash for no apperent reason., other than to be correct XML 
syntax.

Klemens Friedl wrote:

>  New ReactOS Homepage - Status
>
> Mail-Content:
>
> * Status
> * Questions
>
>
>
> Homepage status:
>
> The homepage beta test started last week. Join #reactos-hp for more
> information. We will start reviewing and translating the content in a few
> days.
> Content List: http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/New_Homepage_Content
>
> When this is done (approximatly one week) we will be able to relaunch the
> homepage!
>
> Homepage release date: "When it's done!" ;)
>
>
>
> Questions:
>
> 1) Should the homepage section be called ... ?
> a: developer
> b: development
> c: developing
>
> 2) Should the static homepage pages be ... ?
> a: valid HTML 4.01
> b: valid XHTML 1.0
> c: both variants (two versions)
> d: something else (e.g. xhtml 1.1)
>
> 3) What's your opinion about the following homepage content structure ... ?
> * Home
> * Community 
> * Support
> * Developer / Developing / Development
> * myReactOS
> (more details: http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/New_Homepage_Content )
> a: okay, good structure
> b: ... -> then edit/add comments to the wiki page see link above !!!
>
>
> Klemens Friedl
>
>   
>

[Richard Campbell]

XHTML is the the next version of HTML.  There is nothing wrong with it, 
there is absolutely no reason why we should stick to HTML 4 when current 
browsers support XHTML.

Reuben Perelman wrote:

>   I don't really care as long as it has a working
> forum.
>
>  Also, it should be HTML 4. What the hell is XHTML about? You end the 
>  tags with a slash for no apperent reason., other than to be correct 
>  XML syntax.
>
>  Klemens Friedl wrote:
>
> >   New ReactOS Homepage - Status
> >
> >  Mail-Content:
> >
> >  * Status
> >  * Questions
> >
> >
> >
> >  Homepage status:
> >
> >  The homepage beta test started last week. Join #reactos-hp for more
> >  information. We will start reviewing and translating the content in a 
> >  few
> >  days.
> >  Content List: http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/New_Homepage_Content
> >
> >  When this is done (approximatly one week) we will be able to relaunch 
> >  the
> >  homepage!
> >
> >  Homepage release date: "When it's done!" ;)
> >
> >
> >
> >  Questions:
> >
> >  1) Should the homepage section be called ... ?
> >  a: developer
> >  b: development
> >  c: developing
> >
> >  2) Should the static homepage pages be ... ?
> >  a: valid HTML 4.01
> >  b: valid XHTML 1.0
> >  c: both variants (two versions)
> >  d: something else (e.g. xhtml 1.1)
> >
> >  3) What's your opinion about the following homepage content structure 
> >  ... ?
> >  * Home
> >  * Community * Support
> >  * Developer / Developing / Development
> >  * myReactOS
> >  (more details: 
> >  http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/New_Homepage_Content )
> >  a: okay, good structure
> >  b: ... -> then edit/add comments to the wiki page see link above !!!
> >
> >
> >  Klemens Friedl
> >
> >   
> >  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
>  http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>

[Simon Cornelius P. Umacob]

"Why should I care if my document is in correct HTML? It displays all 
right on my browser.

All browsers know how to deal with correct HTML. However, if it is 
incorrect, the browser has to repair the document, and since not all 
browsers repair documents in the same way, this introduces differences, 
so that your document may look and work differently on different 
browsers. Since there are hundreds of different browsers, and more 
coming all the time (not only on PCs, but also on PDAs, mobile phones, 
televisions, printers, even refrigerators), it is impossible to test 
your document on every browser. If you use incorrect HTML and your 
document doesn't work on a particular browser, it is your fault; if you 
use correct HTML and it doesn't work, it is a bug in the browser."

<http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq#whycare>


[ simon.cpu ]

Reuben Perelman wrote:
>   I don't really care as long as it has a working
> forum.
>  
>  Also, it should be HTML 4. What the hell is XHTML about? You end the 
>  tags with a slash for no apperent reason., other than to be correct XML 
>  syntax. 
-- 
And /usr/games/fortune futurama says:

Fry: "Maybe he has a parasite."
Hermes: "Maybe he is a parasite."

[James Marjie]

Reuben Perelman wrote:
>   I don't really care as long as it has a working
> forum.
>  
>  Also, it should be HTML 4. What the hell is XHTML about? You end the 
>  tags with a slash for no apperent reason., other than to be correct XML 
>  syntax.
>   

XHTML is to correct the usage of HTML. XHTML is to contain the data, 
with little regard for how it is rendered, which is why you use CSS to 
make it pretty. HTML tried to do both jobs, not always with success.


James

[Klemens Friedl]

Thanks for the responds.

But, please answer also my questions.

E.g.:
1) a
2) b
3) a

Currently the new homepage is in HTML 4.01 Transitional and XHTML 1.0
Transitional!

If you are using exotic browsers then please join the #reactos-hp on
freenode.net channel and read the channel topic first. There is also the
link to the beta test homepage.

I found a bug in the safari browser that was shipped with Mac OS X 10.4
(Tiger). But i do not know if this bug is already fixed, so please test the
homepage (especially "myReactOS" section).
The bug has nothing to do with the reactos homepage itself. It is a bug in
the browser! Wired, is the fact that konqueror (the big brother of the
safari) works fine with "server.com/?foo1=foo2" urls.

Please let me know, if safari does work with the latest update. (I do not
have access to a mac computer)


Klemens Friedl


P.S.: I filled a bug entry on the official bug tracking system on the apple
dev homepage.

>   wrote: "Klemens Friedl"
> <klemens_friedl(a)gmx.net>
>  
>  New ReactOS Homepage - Status
>  
>  Mail-Content:
>  
>  * Status
>  * Questions
>  
>  
>  
>  Homepage status:
>  
>  The homepage beta test started last week. Join #reactos-hp for more
>  information. We will start reviewing and translating the content in a few
>  days.
>  Content List: http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/New_Homepage_Content
>  
>  When this is done (approximatly one week) we will be able to relaunch the
>  homepage!
>  
>  Homepage release date: "When it's done!" ;)
>  
>  
>  
>  Questions:
>  
>  1) Should the homepage section be called ... ?
>  a: developer
>  b: development
>  c: developing
>  
>  2) Should the static homepage pages be ... ?
>  a: valid HTML 4.01
>  b: valid XHTML 1.0
>  c: both variants (two versions)
>  d: something else (e.g. xhtml 1.1)
>  
>  3) What's your opinion about the following homepage content structure ...
>  ?
>  * Home
>  * Community 
>  * Support
>  * Developer / Developing / Development
>  * myReactOS
>  (more details: http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/New_Homepage_Content
>  )
>  a: okay, good structure
>  b: ... -> then edit/add comments to the wiki page see link above !!!
>  
>  
>  Klemens Friedl
>  
-- 
Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko!
Satte Provisionen f�r GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner

[Kevin Schnabel]

Klemens Friedl wrote:
>   New ReactOS Homepage - Status
>  
>  Questions:
>  
>  1) Should the homepage section be called ... ?
>  a: developer
>  b: development
>  c: developing 
development
>   
>  2) Should the static homepage pages be ... ?
>  a: valid HTML 4.01
>  b: valid XHTML 1.0
>  c: both variants (two versions)
>  d: something else (e.g. xhtml 1.1) 
xhtml 1.1 or xhtml 1.0
>   
>  3) What's your opinion about the following homepage content structure ... ?
>  * Home
>  * Community 
>  * Support
>  * Developer / Developing / Development
>  * myReactOS
>  (more details: http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/New_Homepage_Content )
>  a: okay, good structure
>  b: ... -> then edit/add comments to the wiki page see link above !!! 
a ;)

[Maarten Bosma]

Klemens Friedl wrote:

>   New ReactOS Homepage - Status
>
>  Questions:
>
>  1) Should the homepage section be called ... ?
>  a: developer
>  b: development
>  c: developing 
don't care

>  
>  2) Should the static homepage pages be ... ?
>  a: valid HTML 4.01
>  b: valid XHTML 1.0
>  c: both variants (two versions)
>  d: something else (e.g. xhtml 1.1) 
a

>  
>  3) What's your opinion about the following homepage content structure 
>  ... ?
>  * Home
>  * Community * Support
>  * Developer / Developing / Development
>  * myReactOS
>  (more details: 
>  http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/New_Homepage_Content )
>  a: okay, good structure
>  b: ... -> then edit/add comments to the wiki page see link above !!! 
a (I wrote big parts of it ;) )


Maarten Bosma

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Ged]

Klemens Friedl wrote:

>  Questions:
>
> 1) Should the homepage section be called ... ?
> a: developer
> b: development
> c: developing
>   
>  
b

>  2) Should the static homepage pages be ... ?
> a: valid HTML 4.01
> b: valid XHTML 1.0
> c: both variants (two versions)
> d: something else (e.g. xhtml 1.1)
>   
>  
b

>  3) What's your opinion about the following homepage
> content structure ... ?
> * Home
> * Community 
> * Support
> * Developer / Developing / Development
> * myReactOS
> (more details: http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/New_Homepage_Content )
> a: okay, good structure
> b: ... -> then edit/add comments to the wiki page see link above !!!
>   
>  
a

[Richard Campbell]

>  
>
>
> Questions:
>
> 1) Should the homepage section be called ... ?
> a: developer
> b: development
> c: developing
>   
>  
b

>  2) Should the static homepage pages be ... ?
> a: valid HTML 4.01
> b: valid XHTML 1.0
> c: both variants (two versions)
> d: something else (e.g. xhtml 1.1)
>   
>  
b

>  3) What's your opinion about the following homepage
> content structure ... ?
> * Home
> * Community 
> * Support
> * Developer / Developing / Development
> * myReactOS
> (more details: http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/New_Homepage_Content )
> a: okay, good structure
> b: ... -> then edit/add comments to the wiki page see link above !!!
>
>   
>  
a