r21332

[Alex Ionescu]

> [10:24] <+CIA-9> mbosma * r21332 reactos/dll/directx/ddraw/ (7

files): Unlock ddraw dll. Maguns and I were the only authors and neither 
of us used
> unclean methods to implement it.

You're kidding right? I might as well unlock /ntoskrnl then.

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu

[Ged Murphy]

Alex Ionescu wrote:
> > [10:24] <+CIA-9> mbosma * r21332 reactos/dll/directx/ddraw/ (7
>
> files): Unlock ddraw dll. Maguns and I were the only authors and 
> neither of us used
> > unclean methods to implement it.
>
> You're kidding right? I might as well unlock /ntoskrnl then.

What's wrong with that?
The first rule in the audit is that if the authors say it's clean, it's 
fast tracked.

[Maarten Bosma]

Ged Murphy wrote:
> Alex Ionescu wrote:
> > > [10:24] <+CIA-9> mbosma * r21332 reactos/dll/directx/ddraw/ (7
> >
> > files): Unlock ddraw dll. Maguns and I were the only authors and 
> > neither of us used
> > > unclean methods to implement it.
> >
> > You're kidding right? I might as well unlock /ntoskrnl then.
>
> What's wrong with that?
> The first rule in the audit is that if the authors say it's clean, it's 
> fast tracked.

GreatLord says he reversed GdiEntry* but not ddraw.dll itself.

Maarten Bosma