Re: Re: [ros-dev] Undocumented APIs

[Johannes Olofsson]

Oh... I thought it might have been some kind of expression describing the feeling of "the project is going to #£€% anyway so why not move to Sweden as well..."
My interpretation might have been biased by the somewhat edgy and often childish attitudes displayed in this thread lately. My opinion is that we HAVE to walk a few extra miles to regain the credability of this project. Even if this means more documentation and restrictions for the devoted practicians of reverse engineering.
/Johannes Olofsson
> Från: James Tabor [e-mail]
> Till: ReactOS Development List [e-mail]
> Rubrik: Re: [ros-dev] Undocumented APIs
> Datum: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:43:42 +0000
> Johannes Olofsson wrote:
> > >
> > > Man! Sweden here we come!
> > > James
> >
> > ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
> > Was this some kind of insult?
> > /Johannes
>
> WHAT?
> NO! There was talk of moving the svn to Sweden.
> James
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> <a
> href=http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev>http://www.reactos.org/
> mailman/listinfo/ros-dev</a>

[Richard]

Sorry I'm late on this reply.

There is absolutely NO REASON WHATSOEVER to implement functions that 
aren't used by apps and/or drivers.  If an app or driver uses an 
undocumented function, write a test case for it and commit to SVN.  Not 
hard.  There is no reason to endanger EXISTING DEVELOPERS because you 
want to implement some archaic function that nobody except microsoft 
uses.  We DO want this project to survive don't we?

Regards,
Richard Campbell