Rev 24626 Breaks Linux Build

[James Tabor]

I've tried fixing this! 8^(
include/psdk/winnt.h line 3666 is the orig.

[CC]       subsystems/win32/win32k/dib/dib1bpp.c
In file included from subsystems/win32/win32k/w32k.h:16,
                  from subsystems/win32/win32k/dib/dib1bpp.c:20:
include/ddk/ntifs.h:404: error: redeclaration of `enum _AUDIT_EVENT_TYPE'
include/ddk/ntifs.h:405: error: conflicting types for 'AuditEventObjectAccess'
include/psdk/winnt.h:3666: error: previous definition of 'AuditEventObjectAccess'
was here
include/ddk/ntifs.h:407: error: conflicting types for
'AuditEventDirectoryServiceAccess'
include/psdk/winnt.h:3668: error: previous definition of
'AuditEventDirectoryServiceAccess' was here

[David Ianno]

the windows build is also broken with the same error.

James Tabor <jimtabor(a)adsl-64-217-116-74.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net> wrote: I've
tried fixing this! 8^(
include/psdk/winnt.h line 3666 is the orig.

[CC]       subsystems/win32/win32k/dib/dib1bpp.c
In file included from subsystems/win32/win32k/w32k.h:16,
                  from subsystems/win32/win32k/dib/dib1bpp.c:20:
include/ddk/ntifs.h:404: error: redeclaration of `enum _AUDIT_EVENT_TYPE'
include/ddk/ntifs.h:405: error: conflicting types for 'AuditEventObjectAccess'
include/psdk/winnt.h:3666: error: previous definition of 'AuditEventObjectAccess'
was here
include/ddk/ntifs.h:407: error: conflicting types for
'AuditEventDirectoryServiceAccess'
include/psdk/winnt.h:3668: error: previous definition of
'AuditEventDirectoryServiceAccess' was here
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev


 		
---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.  Great rates starting at
1¢/min.

[Peter Dolding]

CDDL is the license that most sources of ZFS code is under.
And Reactos is GPL is not compatible.

Now a few things will Reactos except non GPL drivers. As long as the 
drivers are  under a open source license.  Even if license is not 
directly compatible with GPL.

Also header files and other incompatibility.  Is there anything in the 
reactos header files that would cause trouble for a  ZFS file system 
driver using CDDL.

Same kinda of assessment are kinda required to get other company's to 
provide open source drivers as well.  Because not all company's use GPL 
compatible licenses for there drivers for legal reasons.

If mixing is not allowed starting from base documentation would be 
required.  That is not exactly the most effective way but if that is the 
way it has to be done that is the way it has to be done..

Peter Dolding

[Magnus Olsen]

after reading part of CDDL around 50% of the licen before i give up
basic if u use part or whole source code from a CDDL project all u own code
will automatic belong to
frist devloper of the the CDDL project.

The frist programer can force u pay money if u dispurte it as Execute avail,
he have right claim money for the pantent he have, if he have one. say u
have a pantent and implement it in a CDDL project u will agreed give it
to the frist devloper of the CDDL project for free. basic u give up pantent
and give it to him for free, if u got one.

and allot other bad thing.

CDDL are not comptaible with GPL or BSD or FreeWare or MIT X11

I will not comment any more or send mail about CDDL





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Dolding" <oiaohm(a)bluebottle.com>
To: "ReactOS Development List" <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 12:46 PM
Subject: [ros-dev] Got a little nightmare ZFS and Reactos.


>   CDDL is the license that most sources of ZFS code is
> under.
>  And Reactos is GPL is not compatible.
>
>  Now a few things will Reactos except non GPL drivers. As long as the
>  drivers are  under a open source license.  Even if license is not
>  directly compatible with GPL.
>
>  Also header files and other incompatibility.  Is there anything in the
>  reactos header files that would cause trouble for a  ZFS file system
>  driver using CDDL.
>
>  Same kinda of assessment are kinda required to get other company's to
>  provide open source drivers as well.  Because not all company's use GPL
>  compatible licenses for there drivers for legal reasons.
>
>  If mixing is not allowed starting from base documentation would be
>  required.  That is not exactly the most effective way but if that is the
>  way it has to be done that is the way it has to be done..
>
>  Peter Dolding
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev