Re: Document pch and linkerflag elements.

[Martin Fuchs]

Hello,

the main XML build file "ReactOS.xml" is referencing a DTD file
"tools/rbuild/project.dtd". But it's not included in the SVN
repository. Is there already such a file? And in that case - could you
please check it in?

Thanks,

    Martin

[Casper Hornstrup]

I don't know of such a file. Maybe Royce has one.

Casper

>   -----Original Message-----
>  From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.com [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> Martin Fuchs
>  Sent: 31. juli 2005 10:21
>  To: ReactOS Development List
>  Subject: [ros-dev] Re: Document pch and linkerflag elements.
>  
>  Hello,
>  
>  the main XML build file "ReactOS.xml" is referencing a DTD file
>  "tools/rbuild/project.dtd". But it's not included in the SVN
>  repository. Is there already such a file? And in that case - could you
>  please check it in?
>  
>  Thanks,
>  
>      Martin
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
>  http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Royce Mitchell III]

I had at one time, but...

1) I don't any more

2) The structure changed a lot since I had written it anyway.

Sorry :(

Casper Hornstrup wrote:

>  I don't know of such a file. Maybe Royce has one.
>
> Casper
>
>   
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.com [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Martin
> > Fuchs
> > Sent: 31. juli 2005 10:21
> > To: ReactOS Development List
> > Subject: [ros-dev] Re: Document pch and linkerflag elements.
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > the main XML build file "ReactOS.xml" is referencing a DTD file
> > "tools/rbuild/project.dtd". But it's not included in the SVN
> > repository. Is there already such a file? And in that case - could you
> > please check it in?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >     Martin
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ros-dev mailing list
> > Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
> > http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >     
> >  
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
> http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> .
>
>   
>

[Royce Mitchell III]

Royce Mitchell III wrote:

>   I had at one time, but...
>
>  1) I don't any more
>
>  2) The structure changed a lot since I had written it anyway.
>
>  Sorry :(
>  
Also, I could never get it to work with validators because I couldn't 
find a way to get them to recognize the "xi" namespace

[Emanuele Aliberti]

There is a problem with our XML. XInclude requires that included XML 
files contain a single node. We violate that rule almost everywhere.

For instance. In ReactOS.xml there is

<xi:include href="baseaddress.xml" />

but baseaddress.xml contains only a set of <property ... /> nodes, not a 
containing node. I tried wrapping them with a <group>...</group> node

<group>
  <property ... />
  ...
</group>

and it works fine. More difficult is the <directory ...> case.


Royce Mitchell III wrote:

> >   I had at one
> > time, but...
> >
> >  1) I don't any more
> >
> >  2) The structure changed a lot since I had written it anyway.
> >
> >  Sorry :(
> >  
>  Also, I could never get it to work with validators because I couldn't 
>  find a way to get them to recognize the "xi" namespace
>  
-- 
:Emanuele Aliberti

[Royce Mitchell III]

Emanuele Aliberti wrote:

>   There is a problem with our XML. XInclude requires
> that included XML 
>  files contain a single node. We violate that rule almost everywhere.
>
>  For instance. In ReactOS.xml there is
>
>  <xi:include href="baseaddress.xml" />
>
>  but baseaddress.xml contains only a set of <property ... /> nodes, not 
>  a containing node. I tried wrapping them with a <group>...</group> node
>
>  <group>
>   <property ... />
>   ...
>  </group>
>
>  and it works fine. More difficult is the <directory ...> case. 
IMHO, A special "do-nothing" xml tag should be created for this purpose.

[Emanuele Aliberti]

Royce Mitchell III wrote:

>   Emanuele Aliberti wrote:
>
> >   There is a problem with our XML. XInclude
> > requires that included XML 
> >  files contain a single node. We violate that rule almost everywhere.
> >
> >  For instance. In ReactOS.xml there is
> >
> >  <xi:include href="baseaddress.xml" />
> >
> >  but baseaddress.xml contains only a set of <property ... /> nodes, 
> >  not a containing node. I tried wrapping them with a 
> >  <group>...</group> node
> >
> >  <group>
> >   <property ... />
> >   ...
> >  </group>
> >
> >  and it works fine. More difficult is the <directory ...> case. 
>
>  IMHO, A special "do-nothing" xml tag should be created for this purpose.
>
>  
<group> looks like harmless, but i could not find what it is for.

I put the HTML rendering of the rbuild reference on line here 
http://users.libero.it/ea/ros/rbuild/ for wider audience and peer review.

After some <group>'ing, loading ReactOS.xml in XXE 2.10 emits this error 
now:

/project/xi:include:
cannot load file "E:\src\ros\trunk\reactos\config.xml": 
E:\src\ros\trunk\reactos\config.xml (file not found)

I don't know if it is wrong how we specify xi:fallback or if XXE is wrong.

-- 
:Emanuele Aliberti

[Royce Mitchell III]

Emanuele Aliberti wrote:

>   <group> looks like harmless, but i could not
> find what it is for. 
It was (mostly) created for specifying common options for a collection 
of entities. However, a tag specifically documented as a top-level tag 
for xi:included files would be better to use for "readability" purposes.

>   I put the HTML rendering of the rbuild reference on
> line here 
>  http://users.libero.it/ea/ros/rbuild/ for wider audience and peer review. 
Cool, thank you.

>   After some <group>'ing, loading ReactOS.xml
> in XXE 2.10 emits this 
>  error now:
>
>  /project/xi:include:
>  cannot load file "E:\src\ros\trunk\reactos\config.xml": 
>  E:\src\ros\trunk\reactos\config.xml (file not found)
>
>  I don't know if it is wrong how we specify xi:fallback or if XXE is 
>  wrong. 
http://www.stylusstudio.com/w3c/xinclude/include_element.htm
http://www.stylusstudio.com/w3c/xinclude/fallback_element.htm#fallback_elem…

It looks like our use of xi:fallback is correct. Perhaps, though, the 
problem is that we're not including a DTD for <xi:include>. I tried 
doing that once, but the tools I had at hand couldn't get past first 
base with external namespaces.

[Emanuele Aliberti]

Royce Mitchell III wrote:

>   It looks like our use of xi:fallback is correct.
> Perhaps, though, the 
>  problem is that we're not including a DTD for <xi:include>. I tried 
>  doing that once, but the tools I had at hand couldn't get past first 
>  base with external namespaces. 
I just commited a rough DTD for the 'project' document. XXE 2.10 says 
ReactOS.xml is valid (it may be boggy, just like XInclude support though).


-- 
:Emanuele Aliberti

[Emanuele Aliberti]

Emanuele Aliberti wrote:

>   After some <group>'ing, loading ReactOS.xml
> in XXE 2.10 emits this 
>  error now:
>
>  /project/xi:include:
>  cannot load file "E:\src\ros\trunk\reactos\config.xml": 
>  E:\src\ros\trunk\reactos\config.xml (file not found)
>
>  I don't know if it is wrong how we specify xi:fallback or if XXE is 
>  wrong.
>  
XML Inclusions (http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xinclude-20041220/) 
specify exactly what we do (§ 3.2):

<xi:include ...>
  <xi:fallback>
    <xi:include ... />
  </xi:fallback>
</xi:include>

and says (§ 4.4) that "XInclude processors must perform fallback 
behavior in the event of a resource error, [omissis]".

It seems XXE 2.10 has a bug.

-- 
:Emanuele Aliberti