Re: [ros-svn] [hpoussin] 20343: Replace implementation of QueryServiceConfigW by a stub (like in pre-20255), as rpcrt4 throws sometimes an exception and breaks PnP manager

[James Tabor]

hpoussin(a)svn.reactos.com wrote:
>   Replace implementation of QueryServiceConfigW by a
> stub (like in pre-20255), as rpcrt4 throws sometimes an exception and breaks PnP manager
>  
>   
LOL!
That was no surprise! Sounds like Wine need to fix their broken code.
I had a patch but I'm still ban from sending email to wine-patch! So~
rm * the patch!

James

[Ge van Geldorp]

>   From: James Tabor
>
>  Sounds like Wine need to fix their broken code. 
Huh? If we rely on that code, I don't see why "we" shouldn't fix it
instead
of "them".

>   I had a patch but I'm still ban from sending email
> to 
>  wine-patch! So~ rm * the patch! 
I'd be happy to submit it on your behalf.

GvG

[James Tabor]

Hi Ge!
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
> >  From: James
> > Tabor
> >
> > Sounds like Wine need to fix their broken code. 
>  
>  
>  Huh? If we rely on that code, I don't see why "we" shouldn't fix it
> instead
>  of "them".
>  
>  
> >  I had a patch but I'm still ban from sending
> > email to 
> > wine-patch! So~ rm * the patch! 
>  
>  
>  I'd be happy to submit it on your behalf.
>  
>  GvG
>   
Sorry it's gone. I removed everything. The whole tree is gone.
Thanks anyway,
James

[Robert Shearman]

James Tabor wrote:

>  >
> >> I had a patch but I'm still ban from sending email to wine-patch! 
> >> So~ rm * the patch!
> > 
Your last mail to wine-devel was one insulting French people and you had 
no other useful input for that month. Also, you don't appear to have 
apologised and seem to not really realise why you are banned. This gives 
me the impression that if I were to request to the relevant people for 
you to be un-banned that you might do the same thing again.

> >  
> >  I'd be happy to submit it on your behalf.
> >
> >  GvG
> >  
>  Sorry it's gone. I removed everything. The whole tree is gone. 

Nice attitude.

-- 
Rob Shearman

[James Tabor]

Robert Shearman wrote:
>   James Tabor wrote:
>  
> >  >
> > >> I had a patch but I'm still ban from sending email to wine-patch! 
> > >> So~ rm * the patch!
> > >
> > > 
>  
>  Your last mail to wine-devel was one insulting French people and you had 
>  no other useful input for that month. Also, you don't appear to have 
>  apologised and seem to not really realise why you are banned. This gives 
>  me the impression that if I were to request to the relevant people for 
>  you to be un-banned that you might do the same thing again.
>  
> > >  
> > >  I'd be happy to submit it on your behalf.
> > >
> > >  GvG
> > >  
> >  Sorry it's gone. I removed everything. The whole tree is gone. 
>  
>  
>  
>  Nice attitude.
>   
I have the original emails and was never about insulting the French people!

That was long time ago and was related to the socialist running the EU and
the French socialist government political. I have been vindicated for my
remarks as we all saw on the news Paris did burn. This was long time ago
and I was not ban then. This was before the War in the gulf and I knew then
that French government would cut and run. I have many friends from France, so
far my opinion is based on working with the French government and from my friends.

W/O given great details, contracting was a big part of my experience with
governmental orgs. Before the war, there was a war on patents. ;^)


Thanks,
James