Can we rename the "Affects Version" field to "Affected Revision"? Noone cares for 0.3.11 bugs and TRUNK ins meaningless. Also: is it possible to automaticcally translate to the current head revision number, when TRUNK or rather HEAD is selected? Maybe when we have FishEye?
Regards, Timo
I wonder what are those field representing really. Closest thing i find is the regression revision. Same problem with Fix Version.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
Can we rename the "Affects Version" field to "Affected Revision"? Noone cares for 0.3.11 bugs and TRUNK ins meaningless. Also: is it possible to automaticcally translate to the current head revision number, when TRUNK or rather HEAD is selected? Maybe when we have FishEye?
Regards, Timo
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
For me "Accected Version" means the version that showed the bug, aka the version that was tested. "Fix Version" can be a) as long as the bug exists the version that this bug should be fixed in and b) when the bug was fixed the version it was fixed in. In both cases revision makes much more sense for us.
Am 14.09.2012 00:18, schrieb caemyr@myopera.com:
I wonder what are those field representing really. Closest thing i find is the regression revision. Same problem with Fix Version.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
Can we rename the "Affects Version" field to "Affected Revision"? Noone cares for 0.3.11 bugs and TRUNK ins meaningless. Also: is it possible to automaticcally translate to the current head revision number, when TRUNK or rather HEAD is selected? Maybe when we have FishEye?
Regards, Timo
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
-
caemyr＠myopera.com -
Timo Kreuzer