[ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 38673: Inline wrappers user32 -> NtUser

[Dmitry Gorbachev]

> Well that was a workaround, because of "static declaration follows non
> static declaration".
> Then it needs to be done differently. But I don't see any good solution
> that doesn't require lot's of hacks atm, except disabling that warning.

It's ok atm. Attribute gnu_inline can be used to get old inline semantics.

[Timo Kreuzer]

Dmitry Gorbachev wrote:
> > Well that was a workaround, because of "static declaration follows non
> > static declaration".
> > Then it needs to be done differently. But I don't see any good solution
> > that doesn't require lot's of hacks atm, except disabling that warning.
>
> It's ok atm. Attribute gnu_inline can be used to get old inline semantics.

Sorry I didn't quite get it. ;-) What is ok atm? How are we going to
handle it?