Re: [ros-bugs] [Bug 399] OpenOffice Metabug

[WaxDragon]

Why was this done?  Having these bugs listed as blockers to 399 allows
devs to find the old bugs easier in case of regressions.  I don't see
any downsize to keeping them listed.

On 12/28/05, ReactOS.Bugzilla(a)reactos.org <ReactOS.Bugzilla(a)reactos.org> wrote:
>   http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=399
>
>
>  greatlord(a)reactos.com changed:
>
>             What    |Removed                     |Added
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    BugsThisDependsOn|398, 400, 937               |
>
>
>
>
>  ------- Additional Comments From greatlord(a)reactos.com  2005-12-28 17:54 CET -------
>  Bug 398 are fixed, Bug 400 are fixed, Bug 937 are fixed
>  I remove tuse from Bug depends on.
>
>
>
>  --
>  Configure bugmail: http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
>  ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>  You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>  You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-bugs mailing list
>  Ros-bugs(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-bugs
>  
WD
--
<Russell> argh
<Russell> iterator shenanigans :/