Life after audit

[Mikhail Y. Zvyozdochkin]

Hi all,
Steven Edwards wrote at http://www.reactos.org/xhtml/ru/news_page_14.html:
"One final note, this audit of the code is going to take a long time. It 
could take years, but it will happen, this project will come out better 
than it was before".
Whether means it, what all development will be suspended for the period 
of audit? I understand necessity of audit, but I am afraid, that in a 
year the urgency of the project will catastrophically fall, and it will 
hopelessly lag behind from Microsoft :(.

I want, that ReactOS have survived...

WBR,
  DarkHobbit

[David Hinz]

I personally don't think the audit will take years, I would say it will 
be something around three months, until we have a ReactOS that installs 
and boots up into explorer.
And anybody who wants to develop something for ReactOS can create system 
utilities that don't depend that hardly on ReactOS and would run on 
Windows (like my idea for a new setup system and a package manager).

And I think ReactOS will be more solid after the audit and development 
will be easier as everything is reorganized and more intuitive for new 
developers.

And considering Microsofts development speed, it won't be that hard to 
avoid such lags... ;-)

Greets,

David Hinz

Mikhail Y. Zvyozdochkin schrieb:
>   Hi all,
>  Steven Edwards wrote at http://www.reactos.org/xhtml/ru/news_page_14.html:
>  "One final note, this audit of the code is going to take a long time. It 
>  could take years, but it will happen, this project will come out better 
>  than it was before".
>  Whether means it, what all development will be suspended for the period 
>  of audit? I understand necessity of audit, but I am afraid, that in a 
>  year the urgency of the project will catastrophically fall, and it will 
>  hopelessly lag behind from Microsoft :(.
>  
>  I want, that ReactOS have survived...
>  
>  WBR,
>   DarkHobbit
>  
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>

[TwoTailedFox]

Some would say tha Audit is a good thing. Time to go through code like
rbuild, and make it better in the process.

On 1/30/06, David Hinz <post.center(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>   I personally don't think the audit will take
> years, I would say it will
>  be something around three months, until we have a ReactOS that installs
>  and boots up into explorer.
>  And anybody who wants to develop something for ReactOS can create system
>  utilities that don't depend that hardly on ReactOS and would run on
>  Windows (like my idea for a new setup system and a package manager).
>
>  And I think ReactOS will be more solid after the audit and development
>  will be easier as everything is reorganized and more intuitive for new
>  developers.
>
>  And considering Microsofts development speed, it won't be that hard to
>  avoid such lags... ;-)
>
>  Greets,
>
>  David Hinz
>
>  Mikhail Y. Zvyozdochkin schrieb:
> >   Hi all,
> >  Steven Edwards wrote at http://www.reactos.org/xhtml/ru/news_page_14.html:
> >  "One final note, this audit of the code is going to take a long time. It
> >  could take years, but it will happen, this project will come out better
> >  than it was before".
> >  Whether means it, what all development will be suspended for the period
> >  of audit? I understand necessity of audit, but I am afraid, that in a
> >  year the urgency of the project will catastrophically fall, and it will
> >  hopelessly lag behind from Microsoft :(.
> >
> >  I want, that ReactOS have survived...
> >
> >  WBR,
> >   DarkHobbit
> >
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  

--
"I had a handle on life, but then it broke"

[Casper Hornstrup]

Which features do you need in rbuild?

Casper

>   -----Original Message-----
>  From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:[e-mail]] On
>  Behalf Of TwoTailedFox
>  Sent: 29. januar 2006 22:03
>  To: ReactOS Development List
>  Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Life after audit
>  
>  Some would say tha Audit is a good thing. Time to go through code like
>  rbuild, and make it better in the process.

[TwoTailedFox]

I was referring to what was done so far, i.e. Changing the file
extensions, since they arn't 'true' XML files.

On 1/29/06, Casper Hornstrup <ch(a)eudicon.com> wrote:
>  
>  Which features do you need in rbuild?
>
>  Casper
>
> >   -----Original Message-----
> >  From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:[e-mail]] On
> >  Behalf Of TwoTailedFox
> >  Sent: 29. januar 2006 22:03
> >  To: ReactOS Development List
> >  Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Life after audit
> >
> >  Some would say tha Audit is a good thing. Time to go through code like
> >  rbuild, and make it better in the process. 
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  

--
"I had a handle on life, but then it broke"

[Samuel Bronson]

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:39:13 +0000, TwoTailedFox wrote:

>   I was referring to what was done so far, i.e. Changing
> the file
>  extensions, since they arn't 'true' XML files. 
Its a shame that XML files aren't allowed to have more than one element at
the top level...

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!

[Martin Fuchs]

2006/1/31, Samuel Bronson <naesten(a)gmail.com>om>:
>   On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:39:13 +0000, TwoTailedFox
> wrote:
>
> >   I was referring to what was done so far, i.e.
> > Changing the file
> >  extensions, since they arn't 'true' XML files. 
>  Its a shame that XML files aren't allowed to have more than one element at
>  the top level... 
Just insert a new <rbuild> root node around the existing rbuild file
content, and you will get a valid XML structure.

 Regards,

     Martin