On Wednesday 14 May 2008 05:08:34 pm Maarten Bosma wrote:
  Actually I think the hole concept of autogenerating a
big make file is
 messy. Also I don't understand why there are no better make tools around
 (or if they are why we don't use them). ReactOs can't  be the only project
 that need a good build environment, can it ? 
The Linux Kernel uses a complex system that auto-generates a file that is
included into a top-level makefile and contains all the variables needed to
tell  that makefile which of the lower-level makefiles to actually use.
The problem with this is that MS's "nmake" isn't as smart as classic
make
programs.
DRH
  Maarten
 On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org> wrote:
 > I obviously agree too (I don't want to blame anyone though). And
 > certain design ideas outlined in KJK's paper are excellent.
 >
 > Also, I must say my last emails critique has been heard. Trunk never
 > had so many good fixes and improvements since, I think, the beginning
 > of 2008 year, as it had during this last week.
 > This shows how much is possible to do if most of the development goes
 > into one, good defined direction. There was enough of chaotic
 > movement, it's time to get to the goal now.
 >
 > I will draft a beta roadmap, and send out an email to discuss it soon.
 >
 >
 > With the best regards,
 > Aleksey Bragin.
 >
 > On May 14, 2008, at 1:31 PM, gedmurphy wrote:
 > > I was going to add my own gripes, but KJK appears to have covered
 > > everything.
 > > I'm therefore replying to this mail to show my support for his
 > > thoughts as
 > > opposed to adding 'hell yeah', 'damn right' or 'right
on' to the
 > > end of each
 > > topic.
 > >
 > > Ged.
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > Ros-dev mailing list
 > Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
 > 
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev 
--
Dialup is like pissing through a pipette. Slow and excruciatingly painful.