art yerkes wrote:
Which is of course fine, but since ReactOS has no use for
it, why commit it?
It isn't needed to meet the goals of ReactOS.
Casper
I don't agree with this sentiment at all. We've always before been proactive about implementing at least visible parts of the API to make it more likely that applications we didn't know about would have a chance to work. I think that's a reasonable way to work, especially if you're working in an area you've got a good understanding of.
I completely agree with this. Some of the rules being proposed seem to be a little over cautious. This 'shake up' shouldn't put a strangle hold on the project.
Ged
************************************************************************ The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster@exideuk.co.uk mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk and then delete this message.
Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com
-
Murphy, Ged (Bolton)