Downloader tool

[Ged]

I think we should make an exception for the downloader tool and move it out
of rosapps into the main source.

I think the argument for having it in there would exceed the argument
against.

Any thoughts?

[WaxDragon]

+1

On Apr 10, 2009 12:42 PM, "Ged" <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com> wrote:

 I think we should make an exception for the downloader tool and move it out
of rosapps into the main source.

I think the argument for having it in there would exceed the argument
against.

Any thoughts?





_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Timo Kreuzer]

+2

WaxDragon wrote:
>   +1
>
>  On Apr 10, 2009 12:42 PM, "Ged" <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   I think we should make an exception for the downloader tool and move it out
>  of rosapps into the main source.
>
>  I think the argument for having it in there would exceed the argument
>  against.
>
>  Any thoughts?
>
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>    
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Aleksey Bragin]

Though the general rule would be to keep all extra components (those  
which aren't in a usual "distribution" of a Microsoft Windows) in  
rosapps, Downloader is our core tool, which actual Windows OS lacks  
according to thoughts of some people.

consistency++;


On Apr 10, 2009, at 10:13 PM, Timo Kreuzer wrote:

>   +2
>
>  WaxDragon wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Apr 10, 2009 12:42 PM, "Ged" <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >  I think we should make an exception for the downloader tool and  
> > move it out
> > of rosapps into the main source.
> >
> > I think the argument for having it in there would exceed the argument
> > against.
> >
> > Any thoughts?

[Ged]

It would make testing clean installs a lot more convenient

 

From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:[e-mail]] On
Behalf Of Aleksey Bragin
Sent: 10 April 2009 19:26
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Downloader tool

 

Though the general rule would be to keep all extra components (those which
aren't in a usual "distribution" of a Microsoft Windows) in rosapps,
Downloader is our core tool, which actual Windows OS lacks according to
thoughts of some people.

 

consistency++;

 

 

On Apr 10, 2009, at 10:13 PM, Timo Kreuzer wrote:





+2

WaxDragon wrote:



+1
 
On Apr 10, 2009 12:42 PM, "Ged"  <mailto:[e-mail]>
&lt;gedmurphy(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
 
 I think we should make an exception for the downloader tool and move it out
of rosapps into the main source.
 
I think the argument for having it in there would exceed the argument
against.
 
Any thoughts?

[Colin Finck]

+3


  _____  

From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:[e-mail]] On
Behalf Of Timo Kreuzer
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:13 PM
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Downloader tool


+2

WaxDragon wrote:


+1



On Apr 10, 2009 12:42 PM, "Ged"  <mailto:[e-mail]>
&lt;gedmurphy(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:



 I think we should make an exception for the downloader tool and move it out

of rosapps into the main source.



I think the argument for having it in there would exceed the argument

against.



Any thoughts?











_______________________________________________

Ros-dev mailing list

Ros-dev(a)reactos.org

http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev



  


  _____  


_______________________________________________

Ros-dev mailing list

Ros-dev(a)reactos.org

http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Cameron Gutman]

+4

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Colin Finck <mail(a)colinfinck.de> wrote:

>    +3
>
>   ------------------------------
>  *From:* ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:[e-mail]] *On
>  Behalf Of *Timo Kreuzer
>  *Sent:* Friday, April 10, 2009 8:13 PM
>  *To:* ReactOS Development List
>  *Subject:* Re: [ros-dev] Downloader tool
>
>  +2
>
>  WaxDragon wrote:
>
>  +1
>
>  On Apr 10, 2009 12:42 PM, "Ged" <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com>
> <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   I think we should make an exception for the downloader tool and move it out
>  of rosapps into the main source.
>
>  I think the argument for having it in there would exceed the argument
>  against.
>
>  Any thoughts?
>
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing [e-mail]://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>    ------------------------------
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing [e-mail]://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>

[Steven Edwards]

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Cameron Gutman <aicommander(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>   +4 
+5

;)

-- 
Steven Edwards

"There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and
that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo

[King InuYasha]

+5
It's a real pain to try to test ReactOS without the Downloader already
present in the installation.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Cameron Gutman <aicommander(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:

>   +4
>
>
>  On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Colin Finck <mail(a)colinfinck.de> wrote:
>
> >    +3
> >
> >   ------------------------------
> >  *From:* ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:[e-mail]]
> >  *On Behalf Of *Timo Kreuzer
> >  *Sent:* Friday, April 10, 2009 8:13 PM
> >  *To:* ReactOS Development List
> >  *Subject:* Re: [ros-dev] Downloader tool
> >
> >  +2
> >
> >  WaxDragon wrote:
> >
> >  +1
> >
> >  On Apr 10, 2009 12:42 PM, "Ged" <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com>
> > <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >   I think we should make an exception for the downloader tool and move it out
> >  of rosapps into the main source.
> >
> >  I think the argument for having it in there would exceed the argument
> >  against.
> >
> >  Any thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing [e-mail]://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >
> >    ------------------------------
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing [e-mail]://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >  
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>

[Gabriel ilardi]

I'm not contrary to add it, but I personally find it very uncomfortable to download a
thing every time you want to test it (specially when you try different revisions
frequently), I just have a secondary hd with the stuff I need to test there...

Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:54:51 -0500
From: ngompa13(a)gmail.com
To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Downloader tool

+5
It's a real pain to try to test ReactOS without the Downloader already present in the
installation.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Cameron Gutman <aicommander(a)gmail.com> wrote:

+4

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Colin Finck <mail(a)colinfinck.de> wrote:







+3


  
  
  From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org 
  [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Timo 
  Kreuzer
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 8:13 PM
To: ReactOS 
  Development List
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Downloader 
  tool


  +2

WaxDragon wrote:

  +1

On Apr 10, 2009 12:42 PM, "Ged" <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com> wrote:

 I think we should make an exception for the downloader tool and move it out
of rosapps into the main source.

I think the argument for having it in there would exceed the argument
against.

Any thoughts?





_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

  
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev


_______________________________________________

Ros-dev mailing list

Ros-dev(a)reactos.org

http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev



_______________________________________________

Ros-dev mailing list

Ros-dev(a)reactos.org

http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev


_________________________________________________________________
È arrivato il nuovo Messenger! Provalo subito
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/140630370/direct/01/

[WaxDragon]

I also keep all my testing installers on a separate partition, but what
about everyone else?  Download then copy off.  Caching proxy?

On Apr 11, 2009 3:37 AM, "Gabriel ilardi" <gabrielilardi(a)hotmail.it>
wrote:

 I'm not contrary to add it, but I personally find it very uncomfortable to
download a thing every time you want to test it (specially when you try
different revisions frequently), I just have a secondary hd with the stuff I
need to test there...

------------------------------
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:54:51 -0500
From: ngompa13(a)gmail.com
To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org

Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Downloader tool +5 It's a real pain to try to test
ReactOS without the Dow...
------------------------------
È arrivato il nuovo Messenger! Provalo
subito<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/140630365/direct/01/>

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Gabriel ilardi]

Windows comes with internet explorer and you can always browse the internet and download
what you want, I'm ok with downloader in, it'd let them at least download
something... I just proposed an alternative to downloading stuff all the time :)


Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:41:52 -0400
From: waxdragon(a)gmail.com
To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Downloader tool

I also keep all my testing installers on a separate partition, but what about everyone
else?  Download then copy off.  Caching proxy?  


On Apr 11, 2009 3:37 AM, "Gabriel ilardi" <gabrielilardi(a)hotmail.it>
wrote:






I'm not contrary to add it, but I personally find it very uncomfortable to download a
thing every time you want to test it (specially when you try different revisions
frequently), I just have a secondary hd with the stuff I need to test there...


Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:54:51 -0500
From: ngompa13(a)gmail.com
To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Downloader tool

+5

It's a real pain to try to test ReactOS without the Dow...
È arrivato il nuovo Messenger! Provalo subito

_______________________________________________

Ros-dev mailing list

Ros-dev(a)reactos.org

http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev


_________________________________________________________________
È arrivato il nuovo Messenger! Provalo subito
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/140630370/direct/01/

[Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo]

well, i needed the downloader built-in until i found it as an iso at colin´s
website

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Gabriel ilardi
<gabrielilardi(a)hotmail.it>wrote;wrote:

>    Windows comes with internet explorer and you can
> always browse the
>  internet and download what you want, I'm ok with downloader in, it'd let
>  them at least download something... I just proposed an alternative to
>  downloading stuff all the time :)
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>  Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:41:52 -0400
>  From: waxdragon(a)gmail.com
>  To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Downloader tool
>
>  I also keep all my testing installers on a separate partition, but what
>  about everyone else?  Download then copy off.  Caching proxy?
>
>  On Apr 11, 2009 3:37 AM, "Gabriel ilardi" <gabrielilardi(a)hotmail.it>
>  wrote:
>
>   I'm not contrary to add it, but I personally find it very uncomfortable to
>  download a thing every time you want to test it (specially when you try
>  different revisions frequently), I just have a secondary hd with the stuff I
>  need to test there...
>
>  ------------------------------
>  Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:54:51 -0500
>  From: ngompa13(a)gmail.com
>  To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Downloader tool +5 It's a
>  real pain to try to test ReactOS without the Dow...
>  ------------------------------
>  È arrivato il nuovo Messenger! Provalo
> subito<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/140630365/direct/01/>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>  È arrivato il nuovo Messenger! Provalo
> subito<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/140630365/direct/01/>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>

[Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo]

but yes, its useful, specially for testing in real hardware (im not going to
burn a disc only for a couple of KBs)

2009/4/11 Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <elhoir(a)gmail.com>

>   well, i needed the downloader built-in until i found
> it as an iso at
>  colin´s website
>
>
>  On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Gabriel ilardi <gabrielilardi(a)hotmail.it
> >   wrote: 
> >    Windows comes with internet explorer and you can
> > always browse the
> >  internet and download what you want, I'm ok with downloader in, it'd let
> >  them at least download something... I just proposed an alternative to
> >  downloading stuff all the time :)
> >
> >
> >  ------------------------------
> >  Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:41:52 -0400
> >  From: waxdragon(a)gmail.com
> >  To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Downloader tool
> >
> >  I also keep all my testing installers on a separate partition, but what
> >  about everyone else?  Download then copy off.  Caching proxy?
> >
> >  On Apr 11, 2009 3:37 AM, "Gabriel ilardi" <gabrielilardi(a)hotmail.it>
> >  wrote:
> >
> >   I'm not contrary to add it, but I personally find it very uncomfortable
> >  to download a thing every time you want to test it (specially when you try
> >  different revisions frequently), I just have a secondary hd with the stuff I
> >  need to test there...
> >
> >  ------------------------------
> >  Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:54:51 -0500
> >  From: ngompa13(a)gmail.com
> >  To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Downloader tool +5 It's a
> >  real pain to try to test ReactOS without the Dow...
> >  ------------------------------
> >  È arrivato il nuovo Messenger! Provalo
> > subito<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/140630365/direct/01/>
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >  ------------------------------
> >  È arrivato il nuovo Messenger! Provalo
> > subito<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/140630365/direct/01/>
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >  
>