Re: [ros-dev] Audit - Ros-dev

24 Sep 2007

Please stop rumouring this topic. I clearly said "if there are strong
circumstances, in future, only then we will think about doing 3rd
party audit, and only from agreement of all devs". That's 3 or 4
years away from now, if such legal problems ever happen.
Also noone ever said SFLC is taking up copyrights to themselves. At
least it's first time I hear this.
I just grepped Wine source code base for word "SFLC" - doesn't appear
anywhere. Also, open up any of Wine's source code file, you'll see
"Copyright 200x Person's Name".
And again, I didn't suggest SFLC or FSF or whoever. Time will show
who and if we need, and who and if agrees to.
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.
On Sep 24, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Magnus Olsen wrote:
...
  It seam u fall into he SFLC traps they are trying push
doing the
 audlt of
 ros from a 3 part project
 of ros, and we shall obay theirs rules it mean all api that is not
 document
 in msdn shall be remove
 and so on. That mean 80% of ntoskrnl will go away, for around 80% of
 ntoskrnl are not in msdn
 80% of win32k will go aways, for thuse api are not in msdn, then
 shall we
 not talk about audio
 no audio system and so on.
 that mean no ros, if we play after SLFC and we need also write
 papper give
 up our copyright to
 them. no thanks 