Re: [ros-dev] Win8 theme for ReactOS?

[theUser BL]

>   Isn't it fun that ppl simply don't understand
> a "NO" I give 'em in the 
>  forums?! 
Thats only a comment of ONE developer. If your medical doctor syas you
anything, do you never asks a second doctor again for the same thing, to see if he was
right?

>   I even explained why and that GreenteaOS is not more
> than 
>  stolen ROS code (*) 
The only problem you have had is, that he have removed the name
"ReactOS" everywhere. But it is still al under the same license like ReactOS.

>   filled with questionable code sources like the 
>  betaarchive forums. So "NO" means go on the other dev's nerves for a 
>  ugly theme violating our and MS's copyrights? 
Why is an Win8-theme violating MS-copyright but
- changing the color of WineMine to Microsofts WinMine
- copying the XP explorer.exe 1:1, only the images on it are different
- having a Look And Feel VERY similar to Win2000
- etc 
is all ok?

Greetings
theuserbl

[Eric Kohl]

Am 10.09.2018 um 00:03 schrieb theUser BL:
> >   Isn't it
> > fun that ppl simply don't understand a "NO" I give 'em in the 
> >  forums?! 
>  Thats only a comment of ONE developer. If your medical doctor syas you
> anything, do you never asks a second doctor again for the same thing, to see if he was
> right? 
A copyright violation is a copyright violation is a copyright violation.
No second opinion needed!


> >   I even
> > explained why and that GreenteaOS is not more than 
> >  stolen ROS code (*) 
>  The only problem you have had is, that he have removed the
> name "ReactOS" everywhere. But it is still al under the same license like
> ReactOS. 
Do you like to go to a party where the host spits into the beer before
he hands it to you? I don't think you would.


Regards
Eric

[Daniel Reimer]

Phew... If I ever plan to discuss about such nonsense, I will tell ya 
next time, ok?

Do you REALLY think that I am the only one saying this? Do you REALLY 
think I did not talk to the others before saying NO? Sorry for you then.

And yes, the first reason why we leave the whole project in IGNORE state 
is because they steal code by modifying the licensing headers, YES UNDER 
THE SAME LICENSE IT'S STILL NOT LEGAL WHAT THEY DO.

The theme is claimed questionable, NOT ILLEGAL. Same goes for the whole 
code they make, because it IS contaminated from it's very start which is 
the 2nd reason why we leave it in IGNORE state. The guy who started all 
this was a forum guy who was pissed for being banned for his MULTIPLE 
attempts to add illegal code anywhere trying to harm us and the whole 
project with it. Thus this discussion is OVER.


Am 10.09.2018 um 00:03 schrieb theUser BL:
> >   Isn't it
> > fun that ppl simply don't understand a "NO" I give 'em in the
> >  forums?! 
>  Thats only a comment of ONE developer. If your medical doctor syas you
> anything, do you never asks a second doctor again for the same thing, to see if he was
> right?
>
> >   I even explained why and that GreenteaOS is not
> > more than
> >  stolen ROS code (*) 
>  The only problem you have had is, that he have removed the
> name "ReactOS" everywhere. But it is still al under the same license like
> ReactOS.
>
> >   filled with questionable code sources like the
> >  betaarchive forums. So "NO" means go on the other dev's nerves for a
> >  ugly theme violating our and MS's copyrights? 
>  Why is an Win8-theme violating
> MS-copyright but
>  - changing the color of WineMine to Microsofts WinMine
>  - copying the XP explorer.exe 1:1, only the images on it are different
>  - having a Look And Feel VERY similar to Win2000
>  - etc
>  is all ok?
>
>  Greetings
>  theuserbl
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev