[PREFIXES] in commit messages still useful?

[Colin Finck]

Hi everyone,

I'm wondering whether our [PREFIXES] in commit messages are still useful 
as of today?
If I recall correctly, they were once added to autogenerate a changelog. 
I also remember that this dramatically failed when Ziliang created the 
0.3.12 changelog and the full changelog needed to be redone from 
scratch, manually of course.

Furthermore, I doubt that prefixes like "[SPRINTF]" (r49512) or faulty 
ones like "{ASM]" (r49413) can still be reasonably associated to a 
changelog category.
After all, we don't even have a list of valid prefixes, so one has to 
first look at all used ones anyway.

Of course, I don't want them to be dropped instantly tomorrow, but I'm 
interested in your opinions.
I also don't yet know about the planned method for creating the 0.3.13 
changelog, so I might be wrong on this.

Cheers,

Colin

[Kamil Hornicek]

Hi Colin,
I find them pretty useful when going through commit logs. They make it easy 
to quickly identify the component just by looking at the commit msg, to sort 
commits etc. (provided the prefix makes sense of course). So I say we keep 
using them.

Regards,
Kamil

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colin Finck" [e-mail]
To: "ReactOS Development List" [e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 11:26 PM
Subject: [ros-dev] [PREFIXES] in commit messages still useful?
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm wondering whether our [PREFIXES] in commit messages are still useful 
> as of today?
> If I recall correctly, they were once added to autogenerate a changelog. I 
> also remember that this dramatically failed when Ziliang created the 
> 0.3.12 changelog and the full changelog needed to be redone from scratch, 
> manually of course.
>
> Furthermore, I doubt that prefixes like "[SPRINTF]" (r49512) or faulty 
> ones like "{ASM]" (r49413) can still be reasonably associated to a 
> changelog category.
> After all, we don't even have a list of valid prefixes, so one has to 
> first look at all used ones anyway.
>
> Of course, I don't want them to be dropped instantly tomorrow, but I'm 
> interested in your opinions.
> I also don't yet know about the planned method for creating the 0.3.13 
> changelog, so I might be wrong on this.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Colin
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Edison Henrique Andreassy]

Hello,

I like the those [PREFIXES]. I usually keep looking at cia.vc and monitoring 
what's happening.

Regards,
Henrique

-----Mensagem Original----- 
From: Colin Finck
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 8:26 PM
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: [ros-dev] [PREFIXES] in commit messages still useful?

Hi everyone,

I'm wondering whether our [PREFIXES] in commit messages are still useful
as of today?
If I recall correctly, they were once added to autogenerate a changelog.
I also remember that this dramatically failed when Ziliang created the
0.3.12 changelog and the full changelog needed to be redone from
scratch, manually of course.

Furthermore, I doubt that prefixes like "[SPRINTF]" (r49512) or faulty
ones like "{ASM]" (r49413) can still be reasonably associated to a
changelog category.
After all, we don't even have a list of valid prefixes, so one has to
first look at all used ones anyway.

Of course, I don't want them to be dropped instantly tomorrow, but I'm
interested in your opinions.
I also don't yet know about the planned method for creating the 0.3.13
changelog, so I might be wrong on this.

Cheers,

Colin

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[e-mail]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Zachary Gorden]

Some are useful, some aren't.  I use them as a general guideline for when I
put together newsletters and as, tiresome, as parsing through the commit
logs was for the past release, the prefixes did help me figure out how
commits were related.  Something like [SPRINTF] is a bit too specific.
[RTL] would have been sufficient and more informative.

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Edison Henrique Andreassy <
[e-mail]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I like the those [PREFIXES]. I usually keep looking at cia.vc and
> monitoring what's happening.
>
> Regards,
> Henrique
>
> -----Mensagem Original----- From: Colin Finck
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 8:26 PM
> To: ReactOS Development List
>
> Subject: [ros-dev] [PREFIXES] in commit messages still useful?
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm wondering whether our [PREFIXES] in commit messages are still useful
> as of today?
> If I recall correctly, they were once added to autogenerate a changelog.
> I also remember that this dramatically failed when Ziliang created the
> 0.3.12 changelog and the full changelog needed to be redone from
> scratch, manually of course.
>
> Furthermore, I doubt that prefixes like "[SPRINTF]" (r49512) or faulty
> ones like "{ASM]" (r49413) can still be reasonably associated to a
> changelog category.
> After all, we don't even have a list of valid prefixes, so one has to
> first look at all used ones anyway.
>
> Of course, I don't want them to be dropped instantly tomorrow, but I'm
> interested in your opinions.
> I also don't yet know about the planned method for creating the 0.3.13
> changelog, so I might be wrong on this.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Colin
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

[Aleksey Bragin]

I also like the prefixes because they provide a quick reference to what module was changed the most in that commit. It's similar to wine's "msi: Implement Blah()". If "msi" would absent, you would need to look into what files were changed, what was the path, and what is the module under that path. Instead, you see it's msi.dll.

WBR,
Aleksey.

From: Zachary Gorden 
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 8:05 PM
To: ReactOS Development List 
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [PREFIXES] in commit messages still useful?

Some are useful, some aren't.  I use them as a general guideline for when I put together newsletters and as, tiresome, as parsing through the commit logs was for the past release, the prefixes did help me figure out how commits were related.  Something like [SPRINTF] is a bit too specific.  [RTL] would have been sufficient and more informative.

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Edison Henrique Andreassy [e-mail] wrote:

Hello,

I like the those [PREFIXES]. I usually keep looking at cia.vc and monitoring what's happening.

Regards,
  Henrique

-----Mensagem Original----- From: Colin Finck
  Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 8:26 PM
  To: ReactOS Development List

Subject: [ros-dev] [PREFIXES] in commit messages still useful?

Hi everyone,

I'm wondering whether our [PREFIXES] in commit messages are still useful
  as of today?
  If I recall correctly, they were once added to autogenerate a changelog.
  I also remember that this dramatically failed when Ziliang created the
  0.3.12 changelog and the full changelog needed to be redone from
  scratch, manually of course.

Furthermore, I doubt that prefixes like "[SPRINTF]" (r49512) or faulty
  ones like "{ASM]" (r49413) can still be reasonably associated to a
  changelog category.
  After all, we don't even have a list of valid prefixes, so one has to
  first look at all used ones anyway.

Of course, I don't want them to be dropped instantly tomorrow, but I'm
  interested in your opinions.
  I also don't yet know about the planned method for creating the 0.3.13
  changelog, so I might be wrong on this.

Cheers,

Colin

_______________________________________________
  Ros-dev mailing list
  [e-mail]
  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

_______________________________________________
  Ros-dev mailing list
  [e-mail]
  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[e-mail]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev