RE: [ros-diffs] [ea] 17400: Add winemine.

[Casper Hornstrup]

Can't we use "optional" here instead of "o"? I know it will
require
two more seconds to write, but it is much more self-documenting than "o".

Casper
________________________________________
From: ros-diffs-bounces(a)reactos.com [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
ea(a)svn.reactos.com
Sent: 15. august 2005 19:31
To: ros-diffs(a)reactos.com
Subject: [ros-diffs] [ea] 17400: Add winemine.

Add winemine.
Modified: trunk/reactos/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff
________________________________________
Modified: trunk/reactos/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff
--- trunk/reactos/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff	2005-08-15 17:04:34 UTC (rev 17399)
+++ trunk/reactos/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff	2005-08-15 17:30:20 UTC (rev 17400)
@@ -299,6 +299,7 @@
 modules\rosapps\cmdutils\mode\mode.exe	1	o
 modules\rosapps\cmdutils\touch\touch.exe	1	o
 modules\rosapps\games\solitaire\sol.exe	1	o
+modules\rosapps\games\winemine\winemine.exe	1	o
 modules\rosapps\mc\mc.exe		1	o
 modules\rosapps\net\ncftp\ncftp.exe	1	o
 modules\rosapps\net\niclist\niclist.exe	1	o

[Steven Edwards]

Hi,

--- Casper Hornstrup <ch(a)csh-consult.dk> wrote:
>   Can't we use "optional" here instead of
> "o"? I know it will require
>  two more seconds to write, but it is much more self-documenting than "o".
Yes I agree. optional is much more self-explainitory

Thanks
Steven


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com