RE: [ros-diffs] [ea] 17400: Add winemine.

[Casper Hornstrup]

Can't we use "optional" here instead of "o"? I know it will require
two more seconds to write, but it is much more self-documenting than "o".

Casper
________________________________________
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of [e-mail]
Sent: 15. august 2005 19:31
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [ros-diffs] [ea] 17400: Add winemine.

Add winemine.
Modified: trunk/reactos/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff
________________________________________
Modified: trunk/reactos/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff
--- trunk/reactos/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff	2005-08-15 17:04:34 UTC (rev 17399)
+++ trunk/reactos/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff	2005-08-15 17:30:20 UTC (rev 17400)
@@ -299,6 +299,7 @@
 modules\rosapps\cmdutils\mode\mode.exe	1	o
 modules\rosapps\cmdutils\touch\touch.exe	1	o
 modules\rosapps\games\solitaire\sol.exe	1	o
+modules\rosapps\games\winemine\winemine.exe	1	o
 modules\rosapps\mc\mc.exe		1	o
 modules\rosapps\net\ncftp\ncftp.exe	1	o
 modules\rosapps\net\niclist\niclist.exe	1	o

[Steven Edwards]

Hi,

--- Casper Hornstrup [e-mail] wrote:
> Can't we use "optional" here instead of "o"? I know it will require
> two more seconds to write, but it is much more self-documenting than "o".

Yes I agree. optional is much more self-explainitory

Thanks
Steven

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com