Hi!
Your actual ROS-Notepad Icons is absolutly the same like that on Windows-Vista.
On March 2006 there was already something like that, there you used a WinXP-notepad-icon, what I sayd at http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2006-March/007932.html
The new icon, what you then choosed looks very like MS-Windows, but it wasn't a icon from Windows until WinXP.
But now I have looked at Windows Vista (in a Virtual machine and on real hardware in an Internetcafé which I know) and there I see, that the ROS-notepad icon and the Windows-Vista Notepad icon are completely the same!
But, existing at first the Vista icon or at first the ROS-icon??? What me wonder is, that the icon was in ROS before the first betas of Vista where out...
And btw: For all the people who have still not seen Vista: It is the biggest crap I have ever seen. I hope ROS 1.0 looks more like WinXP then like Vista.
- In Vista you can not run DOS-programs. But in C:\windows\system32 there are files like edit.com and edlin.exe. But if you want to run it, there comes a window: That there eixting a problem with this programs. If you want to continue or abort. If I choose contine, then Vista hangs up.
- The german version of Windows have also the English-Filenames: C:\Program Files\ C:\User\ .. which you can easily see in the command-window (dos-box). but the Explorer shows for the user translated names like C:\Programme\ C:\Benutzer\ and there is a a possibility, if you are in such a directory to see in the address-field of the explorer the real directory name. But at first you see the wrong one.
- The games like minesweeper wants D3D hardware-driver, to run fast enough.
- the happy colors of XP don´t existing there. All is in black. Black here, black there. The only other look and feel is the look of Win2000.
- The icons on the desktop are all very big, for me too big. In the explorer on the other side the icons are per default small, that you can´t see what a symbol it is ... 16x16 or so icons.
- If you have a 64bit Windows you can not see, which programs are 32bit and whgich 64 bit. In the name it stand there if you run it. There stands in the "about"-window something like "I am a 64 bit window program". But you can also develop a 32bit window program, which says, that it is 64bit. You can not see, if it is right or not. With Linux - on the other side -, the command "file" do not show only information about the Linux-format files, if you have a 32bit or 64bit program, it shows also, if you have a 32bit or 64bit Windows *.exe file. Additional it says if the *.exe-file is completly of native-code (so, that WINE could run it for example), if it is completly .net-code (so that Mono could run it on Linux for example) or if it include native and .net code mixed like some developer do it with Visual C++.net / managed C++. There you can mix native and .net code and neither WINE nor Mono can run this files. The games of Vista are such files with mixed code.
Windows XP is _much_ better then Windows Vista!!
Greatings theuserbl
_________________________________________________________________ Sie suchen E-Mails, Dokumente oder Fotos? Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit Windows-Desktopsuche liefert in sekundenschnelle Ergebnisse. Jetzt neu! http://desktop.msn.de/ Jetzt gratis downloaden!
This icon was taken from catch22.org sometime around the beginning of Jan'05. It was certainly not taken from Vista.
I will make a close comparison of our icon and the vista icon and if they are indeed the same, I can only assume there was some sharing going on unbeknown to us.
If this is the case, I'll change the icon we use.
Ged.
-----Original Message----- From: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of theUser BL Sent: 01 May 2007 15:03 To: ros-dev@reactos.org Subject: [ros-dev] Notepad-Icon is from Windows Vista!
Hi!
Your actual ROS-Notepad Icons is absolutly the same like that on Windows-Vista.
On March 2006 there was already something like that, there you used a WinXP-notepad-icon, what I sayd at http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2006-March/007932.html
The new icon, what you then choosed looks very like MS-Windows, but it wasn't a icon from Windows until WinXP.
But now I have looked at Windows Vista (in a Virtual machine and on real hardware in an Internetcafé which I know) and there I see, that the ROS-notepad icon and the Windows-Vista Notepad icon are completely the same!
But, existing at first the Vista icon or at first the ROS-icon??? What me wonder is, that the icon was in ROS before the first betas of Vista where out...
And btw: For all the people who have still not seen Vista: It is the biggest crap I have ever seen. I hope ROS 1.0 looks more like WinXP then like Vista.
- In Vista you can not run DOS-programs. But in C:\windows\system32 there are files like edit.com and edlin.exe. But if you want to run it, there comes a window: That there eixting a problem with this programs. If you want
to continue or abort. If I choose contine, then Vista hangs up.
- The german version of Windows have also the English-Filenames: C:\Program Files\ C:\User\ .. which you can easily see in the command-window (dos-box). but the Explorer shows for the user translated names like C:\Programme\ C:\Benutzer\ and there is a a possibility, if you are in such a directory to see in the address-field of the explorer the real directory name. But at first you see the wrong one.
- The games like minesweeper wants D3D hardware-driver, to run fast enough.
- the happy colors of XP don´t existing there. All is in black. Black here, black there. The only other look and feel is the look of Win2000.
- The icons on the desktop are all very big, for me too big. In the explorer on the other side the icons are per default small, that you can´t see what a symbol it is ... 16x16 or so icons.
- If you have a 64bit Windows you can not see, which programs are 32bit and whgich 64 bit. In the name it stand there if you run it. There stands in the "about"-window
something like "I am a 64 bit window program". But you can also develop a 32bit window program, which says, that it is 64bit. You can not see, if it is right or not. With Linux - on the other side -, the command "file" do not show only information about the Linux-format files, if you have a 32bit or 64bit program, it shows also, if you have a 32bit or 64bit Windows *.exe file. Additional it says if the *.exe-file is completly of native-code (so, that WINE could run it for example), if it is completly .net-code (so that Mono could run it on Linux for example) or if it include native and .net code mixed like some developer do it with Visual C++.net / managed C++. There you
can mix native and .net code and neither WINE nor Mono can run this files. The games of Vista are such files with mixed code.
Windows XP is _much_ better then Windows Vista!!
Greatings theuserbl
_________________________________________________________________ Sie suchen E-Mails, Dokumente oder Fotos? Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit Windows-Desktopsuche liefert in sekundenschnelle Ergebnisse. Jetzt neu! http://desktop.msn.de/ Jetzt gratis downloaden!
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
Amteus PLC 57 Cardigan Lane, Leeds, LS4 2LE t:+44 (0) 870 8368770 f: +44 (0) 870 8368701
Registered in England No 4760795
theUser BL schrieb:
- If you have a 64bit Windows you can not see, which programs are 32bit and
whgich 64 bit. In the name it stand there if you run it. There stands in the "about"-window something like "I am a 64 bit window program". But you can also develop a 32bit window program, which says, that it is 64bit. You can not see, if it is right or not. With Linux - on the other side -, the command "file" do not show only information about the Linux-format files, if you have a 32bit or 64bit program, it shows also, if you have a 32bit or 64bit Windows *.exe file. Additional it says if the *.exe-file is completly of native-code (so, that WINE could run it for example), if it is completly .net-code (so that Mono could run it on Linux for example) or if it include native and .net code mixed like some developer do it with Visual C++.net / managed C++. There you can mix native and .net code and neither WINE nor Mono can run this files. The games of Vista are such files with mixed code.
Have a look at the taskmanager process list - you can easily see which programs running in 32 bit mode - they are marked with *32.
Christoph von Wittich
I've been lurking for a while, but I'm running Vista right now so I figured I might as well pipe up and clear up a few things here.
On 5/1/07, theUser BL theuserbl@hotmail.com wrote:
- In Vista you can not run DOS-programs. But in C:\windows\system32 there
are files like edit.com and edlin.exe. But if you want to run it, there comes a window: That there eixting a problem with this programs. If you want to continue or abort. If I choose contine, then Vista hangs up.
They run fine for me on 32-bit Vista Business...
- the happy colors of XP don´t existing there. All is in black. Black here,
black there. The only other look and feel is the look of Win2000.
You can change the colors of Aero Glass (although in the case of the taskbar it only gives a colored tint to the black...) and if you turn off Aero Glass, the default fallback is "Vista Basic", which is light blue and more similar to the XP style.
- The icons on the desktop are all very big, for me too big.
Right-click, View -> Classic Icons.
In the explorer on the other side the icons are per default small, that you can´t see what a symbol it is ... 16x16 or so icons.
Use the "Views" slider to resize these icons.
-Gabriel